Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 2005
71 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 2005.
- NAZIR AHMED v. THE STATE 2005 PLD 1
In section 1 (3), zakat and subsection (3) of section 1 of the Usher Ordinance, 1980, the deduction of the zakat-ex exemption from Provo did not distinguish between the followers of the five recognize…
- Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAKI v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2005 PLD 3
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 D Association of Islam Engraver of Engineering and Technology, Lahore Act (V of 1974), Sections 23 & 42; Bahauddin Zakaria University Act (III of 1975), Se…
- DILWAR v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 45
Arts 3/4 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 537 Definition of Evidence Defendant was charged with initiating a trial of Arts 3 a…
- ASHIQ ALI v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 48
Section 2 inspection of the accused accused's inspection examination was to provide him with an opportunity to explain the circumstances which, in turn, could have influenced the mind of the judge in …
- LIAQAT v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 57
Articles 10 (2) and 16 of the testimonial definition of the kidnapper's statement that the accused had sexually assaulted her was supported by medical evidence, the commission for the crime of adulter…
- MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 74
The complainant's statement on the suspension of section 426 (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII of 1979), section 12 preventive code (XLV of 1860), section 377 shows that the accused abducted the compl…
- SAEED alias PHULOO v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 81
Section 7 377 Definition of Evidence Sentencing Trial The court examined two doctors who examined the accused, the minor boy, the complainant, two other witnesses, and the investigating officer, all t…
- ALLAH YAR v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 83
A statement under section 10 (2), 15, 16 and 19 (2) of the Explanatory Code (XLV of 1860), section 465/467/468/471/494, definition of evidence, under section 234, with the complainant Denied the marri…
- GHAFOOR v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 93
Section 10 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 337A (ii) / 337F (i) / 452 Definition of evidence record, which is established by unproven evidence of the victim and the victim. Witnesses…
- ASGHAR alias ASGHARI v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 97
Sections 377, 363 and 511 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), defining section 12 evidence, defined a delay of approximately 24 hours in the filing of the FIR The co-accused wa…
- MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 109
Sections 10, 11 and 16 of the evidence are suspected that no foul play was appealed for the reason but no resistance or hesitation was shown by the alleged abductor, the girls were taken into the car.…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 113
Defining the provisions of Sections 10 (3) and 16 of the evidence, the complainant admitted that the complaint was lodged by a lawyer's two-color which was not satisfactory in the two-day complaint fi…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF alias NAIK MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 123
Section 302 (b) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), defining section 10 (3) evidence was the statement of a witness who acquitted the accused and presented them before the d…
- KAMRAN KHAN v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 129
Section 2?2 (b) and Z 377 of the Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979, 1979), Section 12, the definition of evidence, whatever the value of their position during the trial and …
- KASHIF IKRAM v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 138
Section 7 377 Fines (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979I), Section 12 Evidence, which was the father of the deceased boy, was examined, he was given to Section HO by him. The contents of the app…
- ABDUL REHMAN alias NIKKA and another v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 149
Section 11 and 18 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 354 Promoting the Humility of Girls The prosecution's case was proved by the testimony of two female witnesses who gave a permanent a…
- MUHAMMAD SABIR v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 158
Section 7 377 Penalty (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (1979 VII of 1979 1979), Section 12 Evidence Care Prosecution Evidence is primarily supported by medical evidence and is supplemented by a report fro…
- Mst. GUL HAMIDA v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 167
Section 10 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), definition of evidence of 2014, no witness was presented by the prosecution against the accused who witnessed the incident or said he consented to the…
- ABDUL HAKEEM v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 182
Sections 302 (b) and 392 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (4) Definition of evidence was falsely dismissed against the accused and his oral statement suppo…
- RAFIQUE AHMAD alias SHIKA v. State 2005 PCRLJ 193
Articles 6 426, 6 49 Pro and 7 Had7 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (1979 1979 1979), suspension of sentence and appeal against sentence and sentence pending appeal for applicants / accused. Since the …
- MUKHTAR AHMAD alias TARA v. State 2005 PCRLJ 200
The complainant, accused of complimenting section 10 (2) evidence, had alleged in the FIR as the husband of the female accused that he found both the accused guilty of adultery with his wife for the p…
- Mst. NISA BEGUM v. State 2005 PCRLJ 219
Section 10/16 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 109, both male and female defendants claimed that the female accused had been complained to another brother in marriage. The nephew says t…
- MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. ZAFAR WARAICH 2005 PCRLJ 261
Complaints under Sections 200, 202, 190 (2), 435, 439 and 537 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 427/504/506 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17…
- MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. State 2005 PCrLJ 355
Section 10 (3) / 18 was charged with defining evidence that the accused had been accused of, leading to discrimination. It was alleged that the charge was imposed under section 18 of the Adultery (Enf…
- HAMEED MASIH v. State 2005 PCRLJ 359
Section 10/11/16 Definition of evidence as well as the nature of its abduction, as well as the commission of illicit intercourse with the victim by the accused, was established through legal evidence …
- 2005 PCRLJ 384 2005 PCRLJ 384
Section 10 (4) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 452 and 458 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 200, 202 and 540A Definition of Evidence Filing a Trial of Evidence, Complainant's Rep…
- GHULAM RASOOL v. The State 2005 PCRLJ 397
Section 11 Evidence Defined The alleged abductor / victim, who was the star witness of the crime, was not presented at trial and no evidence was presented that the alleged abductor was forcibly taken …
- FAISAL IJAZ v. The State 2005 PCRLJ 407
Section 7 377 Testimonies of evidence proved on record that the accused had tried to corrupt the accused, the trial was not proved at the time of the offense and the accused was sentenced at trial. Th…
- BASHIR AHMAD alias SHERO v. The State 2005 PCRLJ 426
The manner in which the alleged abductor presented the Section 16 testimony testimony was unbelievable and could not be relied on to record that the complainant was a person of ambiguous character and…
- RAB NAWAZ v. The State 2005 PCRLJ 455
Sections 456 and 457 of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), in appreciation of the evidence alleged in the Section 10/18 trial, its presence, recovery from the house …
- Haji KHUDAI DOST v. The State 2005 PCRLJ 520
Defining the provisions of Articles 392, 379 and 426, the prosecution trial court's advice did not reduce the incident, although the accused was convicted on charges of robbery and truck. Individuals,…
- KARAM HUSSAIN alias KARMA v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 617
Vulnerability of Section 7 Off7 of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (1979 1979 1979 VII of 1979), validating the value of Section 12 Evidence abolished the same evidence of abduction (Enforcement…
- ISHFAQ HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 701
Section 10 (2) / 16 Definition of Evidence The prosecution's case was that the female accused who was the daughter of the complainant was already married to another person and during the married marri…
- PIR IMTIAZ v. State 2005 PCRLJ 721
Section 10 (3) (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Articles 233, 236, 237 and 238 defining evidence by accusing one accused, but also for imposing sentence on other defendants for section…
- IBRAR HUSSAIN v. State 2005 PCRLJ 729
Section 10 (3) of the testimony of the victim confirmed the formal extra-judicial confession statement of the victim's statement that the accused Victim presented was a respected person and a competen…
- ALTAF HUSSAIN v. State 2005 PCRLJ 758
Section 7 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Defendant's Response to Section 203 Complaints The respondent of the complainant stated in the court that the police had not filed any petition before the accus…
- ABID HUSSAIN v. State 2005 PCRLJ 764
Article 4 Evidence Testimony The suspect was arrested from a populated area and business time, but no independent witness was involved in proving the recovery of heroin / powder from the possession of…
- MUHAMMAD ALI BABAR v. State 2005 PCRLJ 806
154 and 200 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI 1979), Sections 10, 11 and 15 of the Challan Case and Complaint Case In the Challan Case, the applicant's wife filed an FIR against …
- LIAQAT ALI v. State 2005 PCRLJ 868
Clauses 30 b2 (b), ??? & 34 34 Definition of evidence; Proof of prosecution consisting of three types; Evidence of last seen; Evidence of recovered from the accused's yard. And the last seen evidence …
- ABDUL GHAFFAR v. State 2005 PCRLJ 887
Section 10 (3) Definition of Evidence The Principle of Determination of Punishment Although the youngest was 11 years of age, his conduct and conduct looked perfectly natural and realistic and he was …
- WAHEED ULLAH HABIB v. State 2005 PCRLJ 899
The prosecution of section 561 adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII of 1979), sections 13 and 14 of the Foreign Act (XXXI of 1946), section 14 FIR was the only charge against the accused to the …
- ZIMAN ABBAS v. State 2005 PCRLJ 925
Sections 426 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 201, 364, 452, 337 H (ii), 337 L (b) and 109 Crimes (Enforcement of Adultery) (Enforcement Ordinance) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section The r…
- DAULAT KHAN v. State 2005 PCRLJ 952
Under Section 14 Criminal Code (v. 1898), the driver and the undercover truck cleaner were prohibited under section 439 lawsuit under the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979, and Art 3 and 4 und…
- BABO EIDAL KHAN and another v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 969
Section 392 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) Appraising evidence The only piece of evidence available on record against the accused is his identificati…
- MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 1005
Articles 3 and 14 of the Narcotic Substances Act of 1997 (XXV of 1997), section 32 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD drug seizure (prohibited enforcement) order, 1979 and section 32 of d…
- NADEEM v. THE STATE- 2005 PCRLJ 1010
Definition of proof of section 12 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (a), 377 and 201 of last seen evidence; the conduct of the accused immediately after the alleged incident took place. …
- QAISER v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 1027
The definition of evidence in Sections 10 (3), 11 and 16 as the story of the abduction as described by the victim was absolutely incredible if there was a forced abduction and that too at 2 pm (aftern…
- LIAQAT ALI alias KALA v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1039
Section 10 (3) appreciating the evidence was delayed in the registration of the case because the complainant, who was the father of the alleged victim, was not present at the time of the incident but …
- Mst. RUKHSANA v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 1053
Section 10 (2) evidence was not appreciated by the police, search warrant was not obtained, the act of entering the accused's private house was not only questionable, but also the legally durable poli…
- MUKHTAR AHMAD v. THE STATE 2005 PCRLJ 1065
The testimony of the Section 10 evidence was filed on the accused about three weeks after the incident and the FIR was allegedly filed approximately two months after the alleged incident but allegedly…
- ABDUS SAMAD v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1071
Sections 5, 10 (3), 11 and 16 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 368 accused of defining and convicting evidence, which claimed the affected girl to be his lawfully married wife, with wh…
- MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1083
Sections 302 and 34 of the Penal Code (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 2 (e), 5, 6 and 11 Definitions of Proof of M…
- MUHAMMAD SARWAR alias SARA v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1091
Section 7 377 Fines (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (of 1979 VII of 1979), Complainant's conduct in making a complaint about the Commission's valuation of Section 12 evidence, termed the matter extremely…
- MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1108
The accused accused of defrauding section 10 (3) of the evidence did not file an appeal against the order of his conviction and sentencing by the trial court, but for this reason he requested reductio…
- GHULAM SADIQ v. GOVERNEMT OF PAKISTAN 2005 PLC(CS) 1114
Article 203 D Appeal to the Federal Shariah Court challenging the difference in the rate of increase in the pension of government employees, the government increased the pensioners who retired before …
- EJAZ AHMAD v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1116
Sections 302 (b) and 377 Offenses Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Evidence of Cage There was no direct evidence available against the accused accused Evidence of extra-judi…
- Mst. ATIA v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1121
The appeal against the testimony of the prosecution of the prosecution of section 10 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 452 law in evidence (10 of 1984), Article 76 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898),…
- PERVAIZ MASIH v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1232
Article 2 30un Qanuni testimony (1984 1984 of the ten), Section evidencere evidence was credible and no name was registered in the FIR nor there is any suspicion that the accused was killed. Who was a…
- SHEHZAD AHMAD alias MITHU v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1316
Sections 5 345 and 4 544 of the Compulsory Regulation (XEV of 1860), Sections 302 (b) and 310, and the compensation of the deceased heirs between the legatees, present in court, have confirmed the imp…
- QAIM v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1329
Section 14 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Clause 411 evidences the evidence for the reasons that, according to their statements, when they saw the suspects snatching the buffalo, but they pursued them for …
- IFTIKHAR ALI ISANI v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1339
Sections 200 and 202 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Review petition, the Magistrate was obliged to consider only the complaint while approving an order seeking the accused to c…
- ZAHID SAEED v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1467
Sections 10 (2) and 14 of the lawsuit were filed by the petitioner against the trial court's order for Lee - the action between the petitioner and his wife Petitioner, in a deserted FIR That the co-ac…
- JEHANDAD v. State 2005 PCRLJ 1480
Article 203 D The petition for seeking the entire record of the military court / proceedings by the Special Military Court was set aside by the High Court, which was maintained by the Supreme Court an…
- Master KHURSHID ALAM v. INDRIAS MASIH 2005 PCrLJ 1582
Sections 10 (3), 11 and 16 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD were allegedly accused of committing adultery against a victim who allegedly went missing, but did not seek medical ex…
- MUHAMMAD IMRAN v. State 2005 PCrLJ 1596
Articles 4 and 18 constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 14 The definition of evidence The police officer went to the building to arrest only one culprit and then entered the room where the accused was…
- MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2005 PCrLJ 1722
The testimony of section 10 (2) contradicts the facts stated in the FIR directly related to the incident victim's statement and the alleged victim's failure to recover the pistol and motorcycle used i…
- TARIQ MAHMOOD v. MEHFOOZ HUSSAIN 2005 PCrLJ 1747
Section 417 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 11 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 29 (2) (a) Appeal against delay in acquittal, Applicants / App…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. State 2005 PCrLJ 1805
Transfer of the petition to the Juvenile Court for the prosecution of section 7 offenses (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI of 1979), section 17 (4) sanctions (XLV of 1860), sections 2, 214 and 411 of t…
- SHAHZAD ASHRAF v. State 2005 PCrLJ 1933
The defendant commended in his statement under Section 342, CCPC, that he had entered into an exact contract with the victim on the marriage under section 342, CCPC. The IR was registered while the al…
- TORDI KHAN v. State 2005 PCrLJ 1970
Section 428 and 172 law marriages (10 of 1984), Article 2 (c), as additional evidence, requested the applicant to record the daily progress reports of the police as necessary for the mere decision of …
- ADAM KHAN v. State 2005 PCrLJ 1988
Section 516 of a Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 395 Superior Revision was directed against the trial court's decision to acquit property on trial, under which all four accused were convicted of r…
Other years — Federal Shariat Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.