MST. RUKHSANA versus THE STATE
Section 10 (2) evidence was not appreciated by the police, search warrant was not obtained, the act of entering the accused's private house was not only questionable, but also the legally durable policeman's privacy. Could not be violated. This kind of police action cannot be done by any law or otherwise, there will be chaos. Every citizen has the right to restrict the freedom of his home subject to proper restrictions. In the present case, the police acted without any authority. This aspect of the raid on the warrant house was not considered by the trial court in its proper context; the trial court was unable to hold the trial judicially, appeals filed by the accused were accepted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Sakardu lawyer