Sections 377, 363 and 511 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), defining section 12 evidence, defined a delay of approximately 24 hours in the filing of the FIR The co-accused was acquitted Because the statements of the prosecution witnesses were not proved wrong, but because he did not actually participate in the crime and his presence. When in doubt, the trial court clearly found the case controversial, as the reasons for the trial court's acquittal of the accomplices were very strong and authoritative, and the accused's case was on a very different basis. Since he could not even be punished, he was repulsed. Medical evidence alone confirmed the victim's lonely statement
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
