MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR versus THE STATE
Sections 10, 11 and 16 of the evidence are suspected that no foul play was appealed for the reason but no resistance or hesitation was shown by the alleged abductor, the girls were taken into the car. The railway train was arranged in a hotel, etc., but he remained there during the whole period. Neither resisted nor made any noise to protect himself from the clutches of the accused, especially when the accused did not have a weapon with him in the public eye at all times, the alleged kidnapper demonstrated his desire or helplessness. Did not when it was allegedly made. Thumbnails of various papers and documents
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Chak 46 lawyer