Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 1998

80 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 1998.

  • MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. STATE 1998 MLD 243

    Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 379 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 14 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 242 and 243 Appeal filed by the accus…

  • WAJID HUSSAIN v. STATE 1998 MLD 257

    The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V 1898), charged by the Power of Court for summoning and examining any material evid…

  • MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. STATE 1998 MLD 270

    Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), opting to record the confessional statement of the accused under section 342, instead of recording the testimon…

  • SHIREEN MAZHAR v. STATE 1998 MLD 276

    Sections 10, 11, 16 and 20 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Zenith (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, Article 203 DD Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 561 FIR capture the Federal Shar…

  • GUL JEHAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 288

    Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898) Section 364 The trial court, while recording the statement of the accused under section 342, CCP issued the orders…

  • MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. STATE 1998 MLD 294

    Pakistan Penal Code Section 377 Definition of Evidence Complainant's encouraging confidence statement, which was fully confirmed by medical evidence, explained the delay in making the FIR and the pros…

  • MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE v. STATE 1998 MLD 299

    Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 302/34 Offenses of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) Review of Evidence There is no benefit to retrieving…

  • MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE v. STATE 1998 MLD 306

    Pakistan Penal Code Sections 354 and 456 Criminal Offense Ordinance (VII of 1979), Defining Section 10 (3) / 18 Evidence No one can be relied upon to keep the victim's testimony consistent and cautiou…

  • SAJID HUSSAIN v. STATE 1998 MLD 312

    354 Crimes of Zina (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) / 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Amendment were charged with attempting to punish fornication The culp…

  • INAYATUR REHMAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 323

    Haram (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Definition of Evidence Police officers affiliated with the CIA did not lose their status as senior police officer and D-section P investigated the case…

  • SHAHBAZ v. STATE 1998 MLD 344

    The Offense for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, in Sections 5 and 10 (2) of the witnesses, because of his lower social status, he surrendered himself to a male suspect who, under some form…

  • KHALID MEHMOOD v. STATE 1998 MLD 356

    Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 1979 Article 3/4 In the evaluation of evidence, 500 grams of heroin was allegedly recovered, of which 5 grams of heroin was sent to the Chemical Examiner recor…

  • SHABANA HUSSAIN v. SHAFAQAT HUSSAIN 1998 PCRLJ 365

    The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (2) and 16 defining evidence was delayed in filing an FIR, effectively stating that the abductor did not cross the board. Punishmen…

  • MUHAMMAD AZAM v. STATE 1998 MLD 367

    Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 394 Evidence Examined, the articles recovered from the accused had completely established their identity. Was proved by reliable and reliable evidence. Prosecut…

  • MUHAMMAD ISRAR v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 383

    In section 20, the trial court was unable to record the defendant's confessional statements because of the absence of a trial court to appreciate the evidence, even though he was already in police cus…

  • SHAMROZE KHAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 409

    Prohibition (Enforcement Limitation) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Evidence was imposed by the truck on restoration, including transport prohibited (imposed limits) punishable under Article 4 of the Order 1…

  • ZAHIR KHAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 421

    Property Hurdles (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (4) and 7 Evidence Review Trial The trial court did not satisfy the legal requirements provided for punishing the accused in each case w…

  • MUHAMMAD HANIF v. STATE 1998 MLD 437

    The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) / 18 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), a defining, natural, and exceptions to the one-day delay in filing Section 354 FIR, which…

  • RASOOL BAKHSH v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 438

    Articles 3, 4 and 29 of the Narcotic Substances Ordinance (VI's 1995), Ordinance of Drug Subjects on Articles 45 and 65, the Enforcement of the Control of the Law of 1995, the Limitation of the Ordina…

  • MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1998 PCRLJ 457

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 516A Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 Dangerous Drugs Act (Second 1930), Constitution of Section 14 of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD De…

  • NOOR ZAMAN v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 476

    The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) and 16 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Definition of Section 364 Evidence 5 4 364 Requirements, PCP Non-Compliance Effective F…

  • ARSHAD JAVED v. STATE 1998 PCRLJ 486

    An eight-day delay in filing the testimonial report of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 451 and 354 explained that the medical evidence was prosecuted and that an unmarried young woman, an eye-free wi…

  • HASSAN MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 496

    The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 16 of the testimony were found by the District Judge on the alleged marriage between the accused and the complainant as it d…

  • MUSHTAQ ALI v. STATE 1998 MLD 506

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 516A, Second Prohibited Order (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 4 Article Court Section 516A, CCP Convention Detention and Settlement of Property Second …

  • NAZAR DASTGIR ALIAS KAKA v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 517

    Order of Prohibition (Enforcement Limitations) 1979 Article 4 Definition of Evidence Witnesses from law enforcement agencies were as good a witness as any witness from the public, especially when ther…

  • SABIR KHAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 518

    Defending the Pakistan Penal Code Section 347/34 and the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), sections 17 and 20, the accused was convicted and sentenced to a crime that he …

  • MUZAFFAR ALI v. STATE 1998 MLD 523

    The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 17 (3) and 7 (B) of the Contempt (XLV of 1860), before the testimony of section 394 evidence, the trial court granted the terms o…

  • ANARA v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 581

    Witnesses for review of evidence did not support the prosecution's version of the Evidence for Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, no doubt, it was confirmed by the Medico Legal Repo…

  • MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ ALIAS DHUTTOO v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 590

    Section 302 (b) offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII VI of 1979), section 10 (3) of the evidence FIR was immediately filed so that the complainant could be planned, consulted, deliber…

  • PASAND SHAH v. STATE 1998 PCRLJ 606

    Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (6) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII c ~ f 1979), Section 10 (3) Examining Evidence No Ocular Evidence Available After revealing his shirt and Shalw…

  • QAISAR KHAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 633

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 382B Under the German Penal Code (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 7 and 10, under Section 382B, CR PC Duty of the Court Trial Court sentenc…

  • MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. STATE 1998 MLD 637

    Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10, 11 and 16 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), section 227 was registered under section 10 and 11 of the Adultery (Enforcement Ordinance)…

  • MUHAMMAD YAQUB v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 638

    Section 302 (a) offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII VI of 1979), sections 10 (2) and 10 (3) of the evidence was immediately filed for investigation, the prosecution's witnesses were …

  • ALI HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 656

    The Criminal Code of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 7 Evidence Defined The Chemical Examiner Prosecution Case found the victim's shrubs stained with semen, which led to blood trans…

  • TAGA KHAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 662

    Section 396 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), the complainant of Section 20 in this case was the then investigating officer, section HO of the police station in which …

  • MOULVI MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ v. STATE 1998 PCRLJ 679

    Pakistan Penal Code Section 308 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 103 Extra judicial confession The entire evidence was not verified by medical evidence, was not complied with the mandatory p…

  • MUHAMMAD SHER v. STATE 1998 MLD 700

    Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3, 4, 14 and 15 Applicant / truck owner's employees were charged under Articles 3 and 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 And accordingly …

  • SHABBIR v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 704

    Section 302 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), s, 10 (3), testimony of witnesses who remained silent for seven days and described the incident to the deceased's relatives a…

  • SHABBIR HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD YOUNUS 1998 MLD 705

    Adultery of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) and 16 Validating the evidence There was no ocular evidence available on record regarding the alleged commission of Zina Bill …

  • GUL ZAMIN v. STATE 1998 MLD 713

    Appreciation of Prohibition (Information of Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Proof of Heroin Recovery was not controversial because the defendant himself admitted that the recovered articles contained he…

  • IRFAN MASIH v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 716

    Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 Evidence Overview The presence of the prosecution witnesses at the taxi stand where the ac…

  • FARKHANDA BIBI v. STATE 1998 MLD 729

    Criminalization of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 Definition of Evidence The burden of proving the existence of a valid marriage …

  • GHULAM QASIM v. STATE 1998 MLD 746

    Testimonies of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 392 were neither used by any pistol suspect nor any other articles were recovered. According to witnesses, two bullets were fired on the victim a…

  • MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. STATE 1998 MLD 755

    Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3/4 & 15 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Forfeiture of a Vehicle After the Conquest of the accused Defendant The trial court ordered t…

  • MUHAMMAD YASIN v. STATE 1998 MLD 762

    The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 9 Explanatory Code (XLV of 1860) Defined sections 380 and 41 of the evidence at the place where the accused was arrested and the extent to…

  • TAHIR BAIG v. STATE 1998 MLD 769

    Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 377 and 404 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Appraisal of evidence Additional judicial confession voluntarily in respect of a…

  • FIRDOS BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL SHAH 1998 MLD 796

    Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) and 11 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), appeal against section 417 bad respondents / accused under which sections 10 (3) and 11 were charged…

  • EHSAN ULLAH v. STATE 1998 MLD 805

    Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 3/4 Definition of Evidence Defendant alleged that 18 grams of heroin was recovered from his possession, both recovered witnesses testified to the reco…

  • DILSHAD SHAH v. STATE 1998 MLD 816

    Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 19 (2) of Victim, who was a toddler who gave clear evidence of the incident, accused him of abusive action against him. had gon…

  • MUHAMMAD SAFDAR v. SAJJAWAL KHAN 1998 MLD 823

    The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) and 16 Definitions of Evidence Along with the testimony of the star, the complainant has presented different and partially confl…

  • MUHAMMAD ISRAR v. STATE 1998 MLD 871

    The Offense of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 12 was commenced by the victim of the evidence at the place where the accused misled him through a Mains RA and used it to fulfill his…

  • NAZIR AKHTAR v. STATE 1998 MLD 919

    Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 302 (b) and 377 Offense Hood (Ordinance Hood) Ordinance (VII 1979), Section 12 Definition of evidence for example, medical evidence and positive info…

  • DAULAT ALI v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 1998 MLD 944

    Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 34/109 & 201/34 = Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 (3) and 20 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 against DD. The ex…

  • JUMMA KHAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 992

    Prohibited (enforced) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Definitions of Evidence The statements of police recovery witnesses were consistent with the material details and the recovery of the heroin affected by t…

  • QASIM v. RAHIM SHAH 1998 MLD 1014

    Prohibited Order 1979 Article Article 4 Testimony of the evidence was disclosed during the interrogation in another case and the recovery was not affected in the premises of the police station, nor wa…

  • MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE v. STATE 1998 MLD 1039

    The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 was defined as a delay in filing section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 440/34, not due to consultation and deliberat…

  • TARIQ IQBAL v. STATE 1998 MLD 1067

    Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Definition of Proof, Non-Recovery of Currency Officers' Signed Currency Notes, Accused of Buying Heroin by Counterfeit Customers ? Heroin testimon…

  • MASHKOOR AHMED v. AZIZ-UR-REHMAN KHAN 1998 MLD 1080

    Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 3 and 8, the plaintiff's father, who was the father of the minor girl, filed an FIR against the Appellant under Section 10/11…

  • ZULFIQAR ALI v. STATE 1998 MLD 1090

    The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) and 16 Proof of Evidence Testimony was corroborated by the prosecution's testimony, and it also supported medical e…

  • MUHAMMAD HASSAR v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 1998 MLD 1123

    Criminal of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 and 18 Appeal of Evidence Appeal Against His Punishment and Punishment Medical examination contradicts the prosecution's story as the…

  • SYED AFSAR SHAH v. STATE 1998 MLD 1137

    Pakistan Penal Code Section 377 accused of praising evidence who was a strict religious man and trying to protect his sons from smoking cannot be imagined that he was one of three teenagers after anot…

  • JALALUDDIN v. STATE 1998 MLD 1154

    The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 12 was defined as evidence on the body of the complainant for any incidents and torture and the anal swabs of the suspects according to …

  • ORGANON PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. RAFAT ALT KHAN 1998 MLD 1166

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 426 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Sentencing Complaint / alleged victim who stated that he was subjected to unnatura…

  • MEHBOOB AHMAD v. STATE 1998 MLD 1175

    Complaint of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) The Complainant of Definition of Evidence submitted a condemnatory explanation for the delay of four days in filing the FIR in wh…

  • UCC PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LAHORE 1998 MLD 1186

    Section 302 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3), the definition of evidence was immediately filed with the first information report against the accused, and witn…

  • WAHID BAKHSH v. STATE 1998 MLD 1281

    Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/364/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17, Validation of Evidence and No Evidence of Injury that Caused the Death of the Defenda…

  • ALI MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1998 MLD 1326

    Sections 426 and 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (XLV of Penal Code 1860), suspension of section 396 sentencing, which recorded the confessional statement of the accused under Section 164, CR PC…

  • SIRAJUDDIN v. HABIB BANK LTD. 1998 PCRLJ 1351

    Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 439 and 549 Criminal Procedure (Military Crimes) Rules, 1970, R 2, Legal Status of Criminal Procedure, Army …

  • SHER MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1998 MLD 1358

    Prohibited Order 1979 Article Article 3 The definition of evidence was full of contradictions in the case against the accused and he was not free from any doubt and the FIR has shown that the referenc…

  • NAZIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE 1998 PCRLJ 1563

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10, 11 and 16 acquitted by the jurisdiction of the accused, Section 265K, CCP acquitted Although…

  • ALI SHER v. STATE 1998 PCRLJ 1576

    The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (3) was defining the evidence, the delay in filing the FIR was fully explained and it was understandable in this regard that the me…

  • MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. STATE 1998 PCRLJ 1648

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 and 498 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/337/458/34 ? V, Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965) Section 13 Bail, FIR to the accused's gra…

  • CHAKKAR v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 1665

    Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Evidence is defined as the difference in the weight of a heroin sample, as stated by prosecution police witnesses, and the chemical analysis…

  • MST. NAZIRAN v. SAIFAL 1998 PCRLJ 1689

    Sections 239 and 540 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 363 of the Private Complaint and Police …

  • ASIF ALI v. STATE 1998 PCRLJ 1708

    Sections 302 (c) / 106/308 and 302 (b) of the crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII of 1979), myth of the testimony of the defendant, though the testimony of the SQ II and 10 (3) evidenc…

  • FAHIM KHAN v. STATE 1998 MLD 1810

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 377 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 382B charged an underage student and convicted the first offender of life imprisonment and conviction 382 B, de…

  • AKMAL NAWAZ v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 1821

    Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article Article Q law in evidence (of the 1984 of the ten), Article evidence of the evidence of the evidence and evidence of evidence QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ QQQ Q88…

  • TAJ MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1998 PCRLJ 1834

    Prohibited (Order) Order 1979 Article Article 4 The testimony of evidence was presented in another case of property which expressed strong suspicion over the prosecution's story and subsequently raide…

  • LAL MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1998 MLD 1875

    Property Penal Code Against Pakistan Penal Code Section 337 J & 379 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), the testimony of Section 14 evidence neither endangered the lives of the victims nor did …

  • NIAZ AHMAD v. STATE 1998 MLD 1924

    Pakistan Penal Code Section 377 accused of complimenting the evidence had committed surgery with the woman affected by his consent and it was urgently necessary to compare and group the accused with t…

Other years — Federal Shariat Court

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.