Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus STATE

Articles 4 and 18 constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 14 The definition of evidence The police officer went to the building to arrest only one culprit and then entered the room where the accused was allegedly residing, the police officer said. The accused were preparing for adultery in the aforementioned room, the police officer was accused of excessive abuse, indecency and illicit use of force, which had no option to enter the room of the accused. It was thoroughly demonstrated and it was clear from the facts that there was not a single component of the enactment (enforcement) of section 4 of the offense of adultery. Was present in this case in 1979 and the police officer acted without any legal authority and no jurisdiction and the police officer violated the privacy of the accused under Article 14 of the Constitution to file a case against the accused. The officer had violated, neglected and violated the Constitution, attacking the privacy of the accused's state lawyer, who also believed that the facts of the case were allegedly a crime committed by the accused police officer. No arrest warrant has been made for any reason unless there is an arrest warrant. The issuance of arrest warrants against the trial court co-accused for trial and conviction of the accused was neither without jurisdiction nor legally sustained. r \ n online advocate from Mangowal lawyer