ALLAH YAR versus THE STATE
A statement under section 10 (2), 15, 16 and 19 (2) of the Explanatory Code (XLV of 1860), section 465/467/468/471/494, definition of evidence, under section 234, with the complainant Denied the marriage and instead insisted that he marry the co-accused. Apart from the statement of the complainant and the alleged nika, there was nothing in the record in the nature of direct evidence to prove the prosecution's case. The arguments in the prosecution's case were highlighted during the arguments, but the complainant did not present any satisfactory response, which showed evidence of the complainant's marriage to the woman and the witnesses' testimony was withheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Musakhel lawyer
