Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 2002
32 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 2002.
- Mst. ZAFRAN BIBI v. THE STATE 2002 PLD 1
Sections 5, 8 and 10 (2) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 were charged with committing a crime under section 10 (2), the Adultery / Enforcement of Hood (Ordinance), 1979, in the TA ca…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. THE STATE 2002 MLD 628
Section 10 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), definition of section 448 evidence if anyone was justified in filing an FIR because the affected girl had filed an FIR herself because her parents had…
- KAMRAN SHAHZAD v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 656
In section 10 (3), the definition of evidence is based primarily on the complainant / complainant girl and her mother claiming to be an eyewitness to the case, but their statements constitute such a c…
- AMIR BAKHSH v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 678
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 392 definition of evidence was not evidence of a case against the accused and he was convicted on the basis of the statement of the so-called tracker, on charges and sp…
- LOUNG v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 740
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/307/309/310/397 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (4) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 3545 Offenders convicted o…
- KAMRAN KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 820
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, 10 (2) and 13, appeared to support the prosecution's testimony of adultery, although the incident allegedly occurred on a broad day in a very …
- MST. SHARMAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 831
The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (2) and 16 of the testimony was filed by the FIR suspect himself, in which he charged himself with kidnapping against t…
- MST. SAKINA BIBI v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 847
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 was charged with valuing section 10 (2) and 16 of the evidence which was not charged, or not, of the offense under section 16 of the Zina (Enf…
- SYED ALI HAIDER JAFARI v. MST. SHABANA NAZ 2002 PCRLJ 934
Definition of the Section 11 evidence of the Gadhafi (Enforcement Border) Ordinance 1979 does not prove on the facts and circumstances of the case that it was used by the accused, there is no doubt ab…
- AURANGZEB v. AWAL REHMAN 2002 PCRLJ 1156
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 203 DD Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 497 (5) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement HUD) Ordinance (VII 1979), Amendment of Federal Law Shariat Amendment J…
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1169
Victim crime (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3), 11 and 19 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 2018 Appreciating the evidence Victim, who was a minor girl of about 13 years, not only fu…
- BASHIRULLAH v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1183
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 34 and 392 Appreciation of the evidence The suspect was arrested and recovered from his possession immediately after the incident of recovery of the medical evid…
- MASHO KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1478
The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 is liable for penalties for Section 20 habeas, the Property 20 Rule (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance, 1979, was merely a workable one and the …
- MUHAMMAD AMIN v. THE STATE 2002 MLD 1504
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 426 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979) Arts 3/4 Appeal pending pending Appellant requested that the appeal challenged imprisonment for only 3 years. And…
- MUSHKI ALAM v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1535
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Arts 3/4 Appreciating Complaint / Investigation Officer provided a natural version of the Chemical Examiner's presence report, which was available on record, positi…
- SPEEN KHAN v. MUHAMMAD HASSAN ULLAH 2002 PCRLJ 1556
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 12 Explanatory Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Review Request The Sessions Court moved …
- KARAMAT KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1868
Section 365/392/401 Frontier Crimes Regulation (III of 1901), Sections 11 and 12 of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Amendment jurisdiction Federal Shariat Court and High Court Scope accused the petiti…
- MUHAMMAD TAYYAB v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1889
Additional Sessions Judge to hear appeals for appreciation of evidence, Arts 3, 4 and 27 of the Order 9 (C) of the Drugs Ordinance 1997 and 48 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Arts …
- STATE v. HAZARATULLAH 2002 PCRLJ 1911
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 417 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 accused, appealed against truck driver's charge of breach, that was, ten4 carton tinctures containing …
- QAMAR ZAMAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1982
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) and 18 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 354 evidence should be appreciated, neither at the time of filing the FIR nor b…
- MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2060
Section 10 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860) Sections 302/34 and 338 A Definitive Evidence Testimony of the Uncertain Delay of Incident by a Witness CA: Serious and Serious Suspicion of Her Tes…
- MUSLIM KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2813
The complainant's statement of appreciation of section 2 (2 ()) / evidencere evidence is to be straightforward and honest encouragement which was substantiated by the confessional judicial confession …
- FAZAL REHMAN v. FAZAL REHMAN 2002 YLR 2843
Section 396 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (4) Validate the evidence The conviction of the accused as invalid and voluntary was sufficient to warrant his co…
- SHAHID MAQSOOD SIDDIQUI v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2949
Section 10 (3) of the evidence the father was allegedly accompanying Zenbel Jaber to his daughter was described in the incident with constant and enthusiastic trust by the victim, which was confirmed …
- MUHAMMAD HANIF v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2960
The testimony presented by both witnesses in the section 9 and 14 of the Explanatory Code (XLV of 1860), the testimony of section 382, did not disclose the facts of the defendant's possession of the p…
- FARMAN ALI v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 3064
Sections 5 and 10 (2) of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/318/406/109 Definition of evidence for adultery which caused the pregnancy and birth of a woman due to the murder of a newborn b…
- ANTHENEO DAVID v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 3070
Article 3 Validating the evidence, the recovery of 131 capsules containing 1 kilogram and 80 grams of heroin from the accused's stomach was proved by independent and unwilling witnesses, although bein…
- MUHAMMAD ARIF v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 3077
Definitions of Sections 10 (3) and 10 (2) Evidence The truthful, trustworthy and reliable reliance on the consistent and stable prescription given by the Prosecutor before the trial, which was also pr…
- BEHRAM v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 3140
Definitions of Sections 392 and 382 of the evidence were filed in the FIR with the role of the defendant at the knife point for a refund of one thousand rupees and invalidating the testimony of the ot…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 3430
Sections 14 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 203 DD review application was read under the jurisdiction of the courts, under section 14 of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement …
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 3904
Section 410 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 392/394 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Failure of the accused on the date of the Section 17 Appeal Hearing, ev…
- MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 3921
The testimony of the Section 11 evidence was recorded by the trial court for the statements of the victim and the prosecution witness, but due to the absence of their lawyer, both of them were not cro…
Other years — Federal Shariat Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.