TORDI KHAN versus STATE
Section 428 and 172 law marriages (10 of 1984), Article 2 (c), as additional evidence, requested the applicant to record the daily progress reports of the police as necessary for the mere decision of the police case. Daily reports may be allowed. For the purpose of defining some facts, legal documents to be brought on record as additional evidence which are not officially acknowledged in the evidence and may be available on a judicial file, police file, or elsewhere. This can be considered as well, but progress reports can be taken as such. As additional evidence as to the special diaries, which was not conceived, they cannot be construed as evidence in Article 2 (c) of the Convention of Contempt of 1942 and the times presented in section 172. Eyes may be allowed to be kept on the record. However, PC police diaries can be used for the limited purpose of being used in court proceedings because it is known when the time of investigation of a case is and sometimes it can be used. d In order to dispel misconceptions in this case, but it cannot be used to validate the statements of the witnesses in the affidavit, nor can they be used as evidence in any case as it is merely the opinion of the police officer. Cannot base it on. Court Detection; If the court deems it appropriate, appropriate steps and time can be considered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Gaggo Mandi lawyer