Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus THE STATE

The testimony of the Section 10 evidence was filed on the accused about three weeks after the incident and the FIR was allegedly filed approximately two months after the alleged incident but allegedly it was The settlement took place, but not a single witness came to support any link to the prosecutor's story. The Chemical Examiner's report, along with the unnecessary medical report, was abandoned, though it was positive. But this became practically unnecessary because the alleged victim was a married woman and was examined by a medical examiner for allegedly stabbing the victim after nearly two-and-a-half months had passed. Money was not compared. The fact that the accused is made with semen is the money on the broom that the accused cannot be accepted with certainty under the circumstances even though the trial court did not believe in the commission of the adulteration bill, but I was found guilty of the commission of the alleged rape bill. And accordingly the convicted accused were both guilty, in the case of the crime when the evidence of the partner had to be relied upon when a strong and reliable settlement was available, but the evidence was given in this case. The matter was not completely lacking. It did not encourage trust; it was not safe; in the trial case the trial court tried to convict and convict him, he was set aside and he was acquitted of the charges against him. He was released from prison. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mohmand lawyer