Find a Lawyer

ZIMAN ABBAS versus STATE

Sections 426 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 201, 364, 452, 337 H (ii), 337 L (b) and 109 Crimes (Enforcement of Adultery) (Enforcement Ordinance) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section The request for suspension of 10 and 16 was filed immediately and not only the names of all the accused were given in it, but also the specific role of each of them for the extra judicial confession under Section 161, CRPC. The statements of the witnesses were declared, although recorded after about three months, but in the strange circumstances of the case, the accused did not take advantage of the delay as both witnesses stated explicitly at the trial. That shocking The suspects have threatened them with serious consequences. If they give evidence, they have to remain silent that since the accused was staying out of the house at the time of the incident, he could not be held responsible for the crime, withdrawn. Given because the prosecutor's testimony stated that the compound wall of the house was three-and-a-half feet high and that the accused, Bng, allegedly equipped with firearms, could not be conclusively informed that the defendant was present outside the home. No matter, otherwise all disputes raised by the accused need to be re-evaluated by the evidence, as required by Section 426. Was considered appropriate under the application. The CCPC was neither guaranteed to review the evidence in depth, nor could the desired operation of the unclean judgment be suspended when the detailed evidence in the judgment was in view of the evidence, the appellate court concluded. Ignored, appeal was not sustained due to a legal error. In all likelihood, the future was to be heard in the near future, punishment family advocate from Sanjwal lawyer