Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Transfer of the petition to the Juvenile Court for the prosecution of section 7 offenses (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI of 1979), section 17 (4) sanctions (XLV of 1860), sections 2, 214 and 411 of the property, which claimed At that time he was not an adult, he filed a petition to move his case to the Juvenile Court, which the court rejected, saying that there was no consistency between the medical board's suspect and the report. , So there is no need to prosecute the case by the Juvenile Court. Since the trial against the accused was based on his age determination, the trial court was bound to record, in the scope of section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the "finding" which was expressly provided, A medical will be included in this inquiry. The trial court did not have the option of providing, substituting, or disregarding medical evidence to determine the age of the accused, although some other factors may help find it and reach the court. At any final conclusion, the age of the accused court was obliged to seek a medical report under section 7 of the Justified Justice System Ordinance, 2000, and to consider whether the court would be able to convince itself that someone was in fact a minor. ? This objective can be achieved in different ways. That is, by calling witnesses, using birth and educational certificates or passports, etc., but it looks like logic in seeking medical evidence because, despite its ability to determine its exact age, No doubt, the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 famous supreme court advocate from Dina lawyer