Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 2007

30 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 2007.

  • MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ and another v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Islamabad 2007 PLD 1

    Arts 203b (c) and 203d Majority Act (I of 1875), Section 3 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 11 Islam Petitioners' breach of order was questioned in which section of the Majority Act, 1875 11 was rea…

  • MUHAMMAD SALEEM ARSHAD v. State 2007 PCRLJ 50

    Definitions of Sections 10 (2) and 16 Evidence T On the one hand, the trial court rightly found that the accused did not abduct the accompanying accused and was charged with the offense under section …

  • ANSAR ALI v. State 2007 PCRLJ 56

    Section 7 evidence7 Definition of Evidence Delay in FIR Medical Report Filing The medical report was filed with the complainant on partial healing charges, with a delay of days leading to a compromise…

  • ALI AHMAD v. State 2007 PCRLJ 73

    Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), 5 342 Definitions of Evidence After the termination of the prosecution case, after the trial of the accused, the statements of all t…

  • MUHAMMAD HANIF v. State 2007 PCRLJ 126

    Section 10 (3) Reasoning of Evidence There were widespread flaws and contradictions in the collection of two of the prosecution's witnesses, who were husband and wife. The prosecution's second witness…

  • WAQAS ALI alias WAQAS AHMAD v. State 2007 PCRLJ 212

    The testimony of the accused in section 10 (3) was specifically requested by two, the false interference by his cousin / complainant with whom the accused had business dispute; The investigating offic…

  • MUHAMMAD AKRAM and another v. State 2007 PCRLJ 219

    Definition of Section 392 Crimes Ordinance (Implementation Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Sections 17 (2) and 20 Evidence Against Property, the defendant's request for an exception to Alawi stated that he…

  • Mst. SIRAJA and another v. State 2007 PCRLJ 227

    Appreciating the evidence of section 10 (2) The present case was a very traumatic event where children accused their own mother of adultery and threw her into the gallows of crime for their immorality…

  • AMJAD FAROOQ and another v. State 2007 PCRLJ 238

    Section 156B & 265K Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Investigation against a woman in section 10 who was allegedly involved in the crime of the applicant for adultery;…

  • LIAQAT ALI and 2 others v. Raja SHAHID NAWAZ 2007 PCRLJ 246

    Sections 307 and 447 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Criminal Laws (Enforcement) Act (IX of 1974), Sections 14 and 15 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 417, appeal against the ac…

  • LIAQAT ALI and 2 others v. Raja SHAHID NAWAZ 2007 PCRLJ 246

    Sections 307 and 447 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Criminal Laws (Enforcement) Act (IX of 1974), Sections 7, 14 and 15 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 appeal against the …

  • KHAVIND BUX v. State 2007 PCRLJ 470

    Testimony of Sections 10 (2) and 13 Evidence of the benefit of the doubt The evidence on the record proved that the female accused was a helpless woman at the mercy of a gang of criminals and it canno…

  • AHMAD KHAN v. State 2007 PCRLJ 488

    The testimony of the Section 16 evidence was filed three months after the FIR incident and that too after the recovery of the alleged kidnapper, the confession of the alleged kidnapper was filed 8/9 m…

  • ADEEL FAIZ v. State 2007 PCRLJ 497

    Section 392 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Sections 17 (3) and 24 Judicial Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 2 (b), 12 and 13 \ Definition of FIR I …

  • AMANULLAH v. State 2007 PCRLJ 517

    Section 10 (4) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the preliminary report of the definition of evidence was filed immediately, the two accused had committed additional judicial confession before …

  • MUHAMMAD RAHEEM alias ABDUL RAHEEM v. State 2007 PCRLJ 704

    Although the evidence of the prosecution's testimony in the appreciation of the evidence in Articles 2 and 24 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 391 and 395 was plausible, it had many flaws …

  • ASHIQ ALI v. State 2007 PCRLJ 989

    While appreciating the provisions of Sections 302 (b) and 392, the accused was not named in the FIR, but the next day he was named in his statement under Section 161, CRPC, as well as P.C. Was also gi…

  • MUHAMMAD NADEEM alias DEEMI v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1211

    Articles 308 and 201 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), sections 164 and 364 (1) defined the evidence as both the accused were of age, between 9 and 14 years the accused remained in police custody fo…

  • RAHIM BUX v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1226

    Section 1 361 and 5 365 of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) definition of the testimony of the accused Section 17 (3) of the Crimes against Propert…

  • MEHAR ALI SHAH v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1242

    After the trial of the accused in the testimony of Section 2 (2 (b)), the trial court correctly denied that Syed's plea was not presented to any of the prosecution witnesses. Source evidence was inclu…

  • MUHAMMAD YOUNAS v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1262

    Sections 302, 354, 365 and 452 of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), defining section 11 evidence, lack of anything was not in the deposition of the prosecution's witne…

  • IQBAL MASIH v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1375

    Sections 302 and 201 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), the benefit of doubt in the testimony of Section 12 evidence was supported by the testimony of the two prosecutors, bot…

  • KAMAL DIN alias BAGGA v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1408

    Section 10 Definition of Evidence Trial for a female participant not found guilty if found guilty of the crime, the court held that her conviction and sentence against other partner accused was not on…

  • MUHAMMAD JAVED v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1605

    Clauses 302 (b), 308 and 377 were the definitions of the evidence that could be drawn from the facts of the case. This is because the complainant rehearsed at the accused's homes, who were nearby to f…

  • UMAR DIN v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1627

    Section 11 Testimony of Evidence Two versions of the case No evidence of abduction of the alleged abductor from his house; The mother of the alleged abductor was found missing from the house when she …

  • MUHAMMAD v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1640

    Section 7 was accused of praising the evidence that the complainant had married the minor during his minority in the Watta Sta arrangement, but after receiving the majority of the complainant's compla…

  • AJAB KHAN v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1648

    Appraisal of Section 412 Crimes Against Property Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) of the evidence was not in the record, despite the lengthy scrutiny of the prosecution's witnesses by any means …

  • TAHIR SARWAR alias SHAHAB v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1682

    Section 302 (b) / 34 Definition of Evidence The dead body of the deceased was not recovered and whether he was still alive. Nowhere in the entire record of the matter was it found that the time when t…

  • JEHANGIR v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1730

    Sections 324, 334, 337F (I} & 452 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), 5 10 Validate the evidence before the Investigation Officer declared two of the defendants innocent, but Subs…

  • Mst. ROSHAN BIBI v. State 2007 PCRLJ 1792

    Definition of Section 10 (2) Evidence There was no evidence available that the female accused stayed anywhere with the male suspect on the terms of meeting the female accused and their relatives' fami…

Other years — Federal Shariat Court

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.