DILWAR versus THE STATE
Arts 3/4 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 537 Definition of Evidence Defendant was charged with initiating a trial of Arts 3 and 4 Was charged for the offenses. Order by the Sessions Judge (1979), but before any special action can be taken in the trial, the Sessions Judge is alleged to be the Special Judge under Section 9 of the Controlling Section 9 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997. Created another charge sheet as. The charge sheet was enacted under Section 9 of the Narcotic Subjugation Act 1997 of any crime that allegedly occurred long before the enactment of the said Act and was a gross illegal session judge, though ultimately prohibited ( Enforcement Head) was found guilty under Article 3 of the Order. 1979, but he mentioned his position as Special Judge Narcotics was not legal in law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Layyah lawyer