Find a Lawyer

EJAZ AHMAD versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 377 Offenses Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Evidence of Cage There was no direct evidence available against the accused accused Evidence of extra-judicial confession not convinced by the trial court The suspect / victim's child was last seen with the suspect, containing a version of a witness, according to the witness, another person also saw the infected child on a bicycle with the suspect, but he The other person was not examined and was told that he was not much alive. The last witness to testify at the last time admitted that he was the complainant. Relationship was and was working as a driver with it. This was a very weak evidence that the recovery of the bicycle on which the accused and the victim were last seen and recovered were allegedly used in razor crime, it did not make sure that the articles contained the crime. I was used because there was never a specific explanation that was even a weak piece of evidence. He said that two pieces of evidence did not come to the conclusion that the accused had committed the crime, not himself satisfied with the quality of the evidence found in the trial court. The accused, he was entitled to the benefit of the doubt and the trial court convicted the accused, giving him the benefit of the doubt and set aside. immigration advocates contact from Sadiqabad lawyer