Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 1996
73 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 1996.
- ABDUL MALIK v. THE STATE 1996 PLD 1
Sections 230 (b) and 2 evidence Definition of evidence The prosecution's witnesses were independent and had no reason or intention to include the accused in a false case. The evidence of the prosecuti…
- MST. NUZHAT JABIN v. JAMIL HUSSAIN SHAH 1996 PLD 15
The appeal against the success of the refusal after the Qazf (Enforcement of Limitation) Ordinance 1979 Section 11 was not unbelievable because the accusation of adultery by the accused against the co…
- GHULAM RASOOL v. THE STATE 1996 PLD 25
Implementation of the Manifesto (Enforcement Boundary) Ordinance 1979 Section 11 Appreciating the Evidence There is no doubt that the act of the accused was not a commendable act but it certainly did …
- FARZAND ALI v. RAJA MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM 1996 PLD 29
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 5/10 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Constitutional Amendment alleges that the male accused (applicant no.1) was n…
- MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 136
Section 362 Adultery (Ordinance Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) Definition of Defendant The evidence of the accused was seen near the site where the body of the accused was buried. Was n…
- TASLEEMA v. STATE 1996 MLD 162
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) has been committed with the consent of the accused for adultery. Nowhere in the submission was it suggested that he be pleased …
- MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 171
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 The testimony officer appreciating the evidence, who was the complainant and the recovery testimony in this case also did not appear in the witness …
- MAROOF SHAH v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 174
Haram (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Evidence Testimony Some intoxicants were, according to some suspects, found at a different location to an accused, but immediately identified another l…
- MST. SHAHIDA PARVEEN v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 179
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 103 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (Article 4 of 1979), Article 4 Evidence Investigation The police, despite prior knowledge, shared two respectable witnesses …
- NOOR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 181
Prohibited (Enforced) Order 1979 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 103 and 165 (4) violated the definition of evidence, and serious suspicion arose as to whether the chemical …
- MALIK MUKHTAR AHMAD AWAN v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 184
Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Articles 10/11/18 Prohibition (Enforcement Haddad) Order (4 of 1979), Article 11 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 494 and 265 K Constitution of Pa…
- SAIF SHAH v. GULNAZ BOKHARI 1996 PCRLJ 186
Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 10 (3) / 18 Evidence The medical evidence shows that the victim's hormone is not sustained nor any injury to any p…
- SHIRAZ 1996 PCRLJ 189
Pakistan Penal Code Section 377 Testimony of Evidence Seven days after the incident, the victim was examined by a medical examination, and even after identifying the physician in his body, there were …
- MUNEER AHMAD ALIAS MUNNA v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 312
Pakistan Penal Code Section 377 Sentencing, Appeal Reduction was not pressed on the merits and only prayer was reduced for the accused who was a juvenile employee with a former criminal background and…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 418
Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Defining the Recovery of Evidence Testimony of the Recovery of the Public was Accused and Negle…
- BADSHAH KHAN v. STATE 1996 MLD 428
Prohibition (Investigation of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Definition of Section 103 Evidence The prosecution's association failed to find one witness to the public fo…
- MUHAMMAD ALTAF v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 440
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Definition of Evidence An accused must be certified with independent evidence of such evidence…
- ANSAR v. STATE 1996 MLD 444
Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 7 Evidence Investigation = In the present case, the delay in filing an FIR was not fatal. There was no evidence of…
- IMTIAZ AHMAD v. STATE 1996 MLD 457
Pakistan Penal Code Section 777777 praised the evidence accused Victim of corruption and dismissed his mother's oral testimony, saying that four days after the incident, the accused did not commit adu…
- INDER LAL v. STATE 1996 MLD 464
Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Arts 20 and 16 (2) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD proceedings under the authority of or under the authority of a Prohibited Prohibitio…
- BRIGADE COMMANDER HEADQUARTERS FIELD COMMAND NLC, KARACHI v. STATE 1996 MLD 469
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 320 Pakistan Army Act (XXXI of 1941), 59 59 59, 94 and 95 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), SS 549 and 561 refused to move the Election Court case. There is n…
- ZAHIDA v. STATE 1996 MLD 476
The Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 definition, evidence was allegedly recovered from the possession of the parcel suspect, which he received at the Chemical Examiner's office m…
- ABID ALI v. STATE 1996 MLD 484
Prohibition (Implementation Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Evidence Definition Of the 30 allegedly recovered from the accused, only 2 were sent to the Chemical Examiner for analysis which revealed that 0 …
- SAKHI REHMATULLAH v. STATE 1996 MLD 495
Haram (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Evidence Testimony According to the prosecution case, 100 grams of heroin was recovered from the accused, while the Chemical Examiner's report stated that…
- QALOO v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 496
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Evidence Definition Not asked to become a Recovery Advisor despite being available and available to the …
- MAQSOOD SHAH v. STATE 1996 MLD 498
Criminal offense (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) The police officer complaining of evidence did not obtain a search warrant from a magistrate to search the premises, nor did he find a…
- SAHIB GUL v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 552
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Definition of Section 103 Evidence was destroyed without an order by any court records to show that there was no evid…
- WAJID ALI v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 610
Definition of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 and 7 were available on record to come to a positive conclusion that the victim's vagina was penetrated by a male organ and the acc…
- RASHID AHMAD v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 612
The Criminal Code of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Review of the Evidence The entire version produced by the prosecution regarding its abduction by the accused was rightly …
- NASEEM AKHTAR v. STATE 1996 PCRLJ 616
Prohibited (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Definition of evidence No public witness was associated with the recovery process The investigating officer and other recovery witnesses were not …
- MUMTAZ AHMAD v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 618
Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Definition of Evidence The accused accused failed to establish his false plea and denied the prosecution's version…
- ZULFIQAR v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 620
The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 354 evidence proved to be a motive for the commission of the crime that there was independent ancillary evidence on the record to show that the comp…
- SHABBIR AHMAD ALIAS SHERA v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 625
Definition of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 324, 379 and 411 Evidence Defendant's case As the accused has already shown the prosecution witnesses who have been found in the case, the weapon of cri…
- ABDUL MAJEED v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 629
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (3) of the Contempt of Regulations (XLV of 1860), sections 302 and 201 clearly exempt confession Extra judicial confession is a ver…
- NISAR ALI v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 635
The Pakistan Penal Code section 396, which was allegedly appreciated by the evidence, was not recovered from their homes nor was it proved that the issue was issued by the bank on the day of the incid…
- AHMED SHAH v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 639
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 103 Despite prior spying information, the excise inspector raided the suspect's home and did not …
- AHMAD NAWAZ v. STATE 1996 MLD 640
Defendant (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 The defendant was convicted in appreciation of the evidence and was convicted of allegedly possessing large quantities of heroin, which was contained …
- AYOOB v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 642
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), definitions of sections 452/149 and 148 were not defined by the delay of ten d…
- EJAZ AHMAD MIR v. SHAMSA KHATOON 1996 PCRLJ 648
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 16 and 10 (3) of the evidence Cage duc The kidnapper had to flee voluntarily with the accused and with his consent was sexually assaulted …
- SHANKAR v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 651
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Before raiding the accused's house, the search officer did not receive a search warrant who searched the house and recovered illegal drugs f…
- JANI v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 656
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 11 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 161 Definition of Evidence An eight-day delay in filing an FIR which was not satisfactori…
- ZAMEEN GUL v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 662
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (3) FIR registration was delayed on Ramadan days The complainant was called to the CIA Center for identification of the accused bef…
- SHER KHAN v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 668
The incident was suspected by the delay of nine hours in filing a Section 202 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 FIR, because the prosecutor alleged that all witnesses were very close to the…
- MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 688
Section 517 prohibited (enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD was the petitioner, including the accused, who entered the settlement of the proper…
- ARSHAD ALI v. STATE 1996 MLD 766
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), definition of evidence under section 646464, CCP charged with raping both criminal…
- CHIRAGH DIN v. STATE 1996 MLD 769
Haram (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 was accused of defining evidence that was convicted of possessing 500 grams of heroin and claiming that the alleged heroin rehabilitation was done by p…
- ABDUL LABBAR v. STATE 1996 MLD 772
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Testimonial of Evidence: All the prosecution witnesses said with one voice that 500 grams of heroin was recovered from the envelope, when the accuse…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. STATE 1996 MLD 779
The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, value 10 evidence, but no injuries were found in or around the vagina, and the chemical analyst's report is also in the negative and the compla…
- ASAD ABBAS v. STATE 1996 MLD 782
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) was found guilty by a trial court under section 16 of the Ordinance 1979, 16 of 1979, for which a woman was found guilty of committing or taking away her cri…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 843
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 3 Article 3 Testimonial of Evidence The sample parcel of heroin allegedly recovered from the accused remained in the personal custody of the complainant polic…
- MUAMMAD ZAHOOR v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 850
Haram (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Evidence Testimony A large quantity of alcohol was recovered from a truck that was operating one of the raids during the raid and another suspect (the …
- AMTUL BEGUM v. JUMA KHAN 1996 PCRLJ 853
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) The Contempt of the Code (XLV of 1860), the definition of evidence 452 was fully supported by the medical evidence and the chemi…
- YOUSAF ALI SHAH v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 857
Definition of Evidence Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 16 & 10 (2) Evidence Retained by the Court…
- STATE v. FAQIR MUHAMMAD 1996 MLD 936
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 516A Order of Prohibition (Enforcement) (Article 4 of 1979), Article 3/4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 used in drug trafficking in DD detention T…
- MUKAMIL SHAH v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1153
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 4 Article 4 Definition of record of evidence No inquiry into the matter was disclosed The accused was neither arrested nor identified on the spot. He could be…
- ABID JAVED ALIAS MITHU v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1161
Evidence for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Evidence is being appreciated that the infected girl's vaginal swab was found smeared by a chemical examiner, but a brochure repo…
- GHULAM MUSTAFA v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1217
Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 The defendant was convicted and sentenced to have received 11 grams of heroin, allegedly recovering parcels of the recovered heroin four. After m…
- PERVEZ HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1996 PCrLJ 1218
Arts 4 and 24 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), charged with Section 75 fine, which yielded 16 grams of heroin, was prosecuted for the crime and the trial court found it under Article 4. As well as being a li…
- KHUDA BAKHSH v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1226
Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 156 Joint Trial Justification for which the customs authority allegedly exported a large quantity of heroin, to the…
- GHULAM HUSSAIN ALIAS KAKA v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1429
Disclaimer (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 4 Article 4 Heroin Weight Discrepancies According to the prosecution, the heroin exported in the case weighed 28 grams, while the chemical laboratory reported …
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1446
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Code of Criminal Procedure (V 1898), definition of evidence 342, CRPC unlawful in recording accused's statement by trial court under section 234T Movem…
- BASHIR v. STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1461
The Prohibition (Information of Head) Order 1979 complying with evidence of Arts 3 and 4 could not be attributed to the investigating agency responsible for the delay of approximately 17 days in sendi…
- PERVAIZ v. STATE 1996 MLD 1642
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 11 and 10 (2) Convictions (XLV of 1860), Section 457 Proof of the allegations Although he accepted the request to defend the victim du…
- ASGHAR ALI v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1687
Definition of Evidence for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) / 18 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 452. The molecular testimony was denied by the Lady Doctor's medical evidenc…
- ABID HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1712
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Proof Definition The chemical laboratory report made the weight of the heroin recovered from the suspect suspicious, but proved that the her…
- HABIB AHMED v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1783
Prohibition (Enforcement of Limitation) Order 1979 Arts 4 and 22 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), definition of section 103 evidence already ended in the prosecution's witness scrutiny, section 342,…
- KHUSHI MASIH v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1787
Failure to properly inspect Section 342 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) Section Inspection of the accused under section 342; It should be made to explain its position. If every case of every evidence brou…
- SHABBIR AHMAD ALIAS BHOLA v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1794
The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 11 and 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the prosecution's testimony of the definition of section 109 evidence did not…
- GHULAM SARWAR v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1853
Instead of recording the accused's statement under the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Articles 3/4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 342 and Section 342 of the 164 Clause Magistra…
- GUL MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1856
Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), prohibition of appreciation of Section 201 and 202 Evidence (Enforcement Head) Order, after its incorporation into A…
- TARIQ SAEED v. DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, PUNJAB, LAHORE 1996 PCRLJ 1864
Prohibition (Enforcement Order) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 103 Evidence Appreciation Officer's statement was contradictory and there was little evidence …
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. THE STATE 1996 PCRLJ 1866
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 6 426 Prohibition (Enforcement of the Order of 1979), Article BB Guarantee, Investigation on Trial Investigations Remain silent on this point of Al-Shudh. And t…
- MAJ. -GEN. (RETD.) ABDUL AZIZ v. MST. KANWAL RABBANI 1996 PCRLJ 2030
Sections 7/11 and 6 (c) of the Qazf (Enforcement Border) Ordinance 1979, Article Pakistan (1973), Article 203DD Criminal Code of Conduct (VII 1898), Articles 561A & 265C (2) Termination of Nikki Actio…
Other years — Federal Shariat Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.