Find a Lawyer

KAMRAN KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2?2 (b) and Z 377 of the Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979, 1979), Section 12, the definition of evidence, whatever the value of their position during the trial and its effect on the final outcome. Yes, no one could stop a glance at the significant progress that took place during the investigation, the prosecutor's legal responsibility was to keep all four of those statements. The witnesses and the trial court should have allowed the defense to examine them in their behalf, but after that, the trial proceeded illegally, not to be prosecuted. After that, the verdict against the accused was not heard. advocate from Piplan lawyer