Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 1995
74 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 1995.
- SAID MAHMOOD v. THE STATE 1995 PLD 1
Sexual Offense Ordinance 1979 Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) The woman who witnessed the evidence was approximately 15-15/16 years old when she made a second marriage agreement with her co-accused, whi…
- MUHAMMAD BANARAS v. THE STATE 1995 PLD 7
Prohibited (Enforcement Limitation) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Evidence Defined The following circumstances were witnesses capable of recovering police officers who were charged with making false allegat…
- TAHIR MAJEED v. THE STATE 1995 PLD 10
Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979 Articles 3 and 4 of Definition of Evidence Defendant's testimony was alleged that the accused was falsely accused and sentenced by the trial court.…
- BALI KHAN v. THE STATE 1995 PLD 13
Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 10 (3) / 18 Definition of evidence The victim's area did not establish a commission to establish sexual relations I have improv…
- AHMED SHER v. THE STATE 1995 PLD 20
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (4) Appreciating Evidence Not only was the defendant's waiver in nature not only admissible in nature but also because of other wea…
- AHMAD NAWAZ v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 138
Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Definition Samples of Proof No heroin powder was found in the samples previously sent to the Chemical Examiner and there was no evidence on recor…
- PERVEZ HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 140
Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 4 and 24 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), enhanced punishment for section 75 ex-conviction in which the accused was previously convicted and sentenced to similar…
- ARSHAD ALI v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 142
Prohibited Order 1979 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 103 The value of the evidence was raided by the police party and continued to be searched. Action was taken in the absen…
- DAWA KHAN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 153
The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 20 Defamation Code (XLV of 1860), the definition of section 395 evidence was of a general nature in the possession of the accused,…
- GHULAM MUSTAFA v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 155
The Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979, only 11 grams, was allegedly recovered from the accused, who suspected the entire recovery process was extremely suspicious.…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 157
Definition of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Evidence was not identified as evidence that he was the victim of sexual misconduct, but the accused was charged with causing so…
- ABDUL JABBAR v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 159
Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 164 Evidence Magistrates reviewed that they did not observe the necessary legal requirements in recording t…
- KHURSHEED AGHA v. HAJRA BI 1995 PCRLJ 163
The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 and 11 Definition of Evidence Voluntarily living with him as his legally married wife was not a crime against the offenders and so…
- KHUDA BAKHSH v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 166
Special judge for two separate offenses under the Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 156 of the Customs Act and Article 4 of the Prohibition (Enfo…
- ARSHAD ALI v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 215
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) In the FIR, a person was charged with an offense while two other persons were also named during the trial. Witnesses were also inclu…
- MULAZIM HUSSAIN v. STATE 1995 PCRLJ 231
Prohibited (Enforcement of Heads) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Investigation Officer Failure to Attach Two Respectable Persons of the Eligible Region to the P…
- SALIM AKHTAR v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 233
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (21) The eyewitnesses of the testimony were liars because they could not see that a dark room was located at some distance in the da…
- MUHAMMAD GUL v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 449
The fact of the accused's confessional statements was recorded almost a month after his arrest in appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 394 and 392 evidence as he was not only guilty but wa…
- MST. FAUZIA v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 453
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 16, without being found guilty of the offense, was upheld by the trial court under section 10 (2) of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enfo…
- EASTERN EXPRESS COMPANY LTD. v. KHUSHI MUHAMMAD 1995 PCrLJ 470
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) was read with the Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860); there was no evidence on record to prove the definition of section 109 evidence.…
- MAQSOOD-AKHTAR v. THE STATE 1995 PCrLJ 646
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (1), Third Section Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 grant was in jail for the last 14 months and the case was not heard. It was start…
- SOHAIL SARDAR v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 648
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 3 The testimony of the evidence was recovered from the scooter's toolbox, which the acquitted accused was operating while the accused was sitt…
- QAISAR YAR HAIDER ALIAS QAISAR MASTANA v. STATE 1995 PCRLJ 650
The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 was filed after an 11-and-10 (3) 14-day delay in the appreciation of the evidence, none of the accused was arrested at the time of…
- TAUHEED v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 653
The Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 There was ample material on the testimonial record of the evidence, which shows that several cases were filed against the accused in a short …
- MUHAMMAD QASIM v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 658
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 Termination of DD proceedings Both the accused were admittedly husband and wife, and pro…
- SULTAN SHAH v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 1995 PCRLJ 847
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 412 and 411 Defining Evidence The trial court acquitted the accused under section 39Z, the PPC read with the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, but…
- POMI v. STATE 1995 MLD 927
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article 3 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Section 103/165 (4) Section 103, CTPC search is mandatory and when read with the provisions of section 165 (4). If so, t…
- ASHIQ HUSSAIN v. STATE 1995 MLD 932
Section 4 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 103 was raided after scrutinizing the evidence of the collusion of two people with the approval of a search warrant and a memo from a location, an…
- ALLAH RAKHA v. STATE 1995 MLD 935
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Sections 103 and 165 (4) Proof of Evidence Section 103, CR PC read with section 165 (4), while P. C was not complied …
- MUHAMMAD NASRULLAH v. STATE 1995 MLD 937
Prohibition (Enforcement of Limitation) Order 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Evidence Defining Sessions Court A Court of Appeal to hear an appeal filed by the accused ag…
- DAWA KHAN v. STATE 1995 MLD 940
The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 S20 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 395, defines the evidence of the accused who imposed his face at the time of the incident was not …
- ROZAL v. STATE 1995 MLD 942
The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 20 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), while examining the evidence of section 395, changed the face of the complainant to the robber's…
- KHADIM HUSSAIN v. STATE 1995 MLD 945
Definition of Proof of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 10 (2) Under section 10 (3) of the Ordinance, the accused subsequently changed to one under section 10 (2) of the …
- SAIFULLAH v. STATE 1995 MLD 946
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Definition of Evidence Police have not made any arrangements for compliance with Section 103, CRPC, despite having received first and specif…
- ABDUL WAHID v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 949
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 7 Constitution7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Deleting a Vehicle The trial court ordered the applicant to seize the vehicle in favor of the st…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. STATE 1995 MLD 950
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 12 Explosive Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Definition of Evidence Testimony of an Appealing Eye Three days after the incident, the in…
- HAJI LAL JAN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 951
Section 517 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 394 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Disposal for Vehicle Trial Court confiscated the applicant's car in favor of the state in whi…
- AMANAT ALI v. STATE 1995 MLD 954
Criminalization of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 18 Definition of Evidence Defendant was not supported by medical evidence…
- ABDULLAH KHAN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1025
Testimonies of Arts 3 and 4 Evidence The packets examined by the Chemical Examiner did not prove to be the same as those recovered from the abdomen of the defendants through digital evacuation; theref…
- MST. RABIA KHATOON v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1048
Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 11 and 10 (3) The conviction of a victim may be based on the sole evidence of a witness, but it may be unsafe to maintain such conviction …
- ATIQ-UR-RAHMAN v. STATE 1995 MLD 1073
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 16 and 10 (3) Hearing of the Testimony of Evidence The affected girl was not examined as a witness in the trial court which relied solely …
- MUSTAFA KHAN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1084
Prohibition (Enforcement of Limitation) Order 1979 Arts 3 (1) (a) and 3 (2) (i) Appraisal of evidence was not responsible for the retaliation in those cases which required two independent witnesses in…
- MANZOOR v. STATE 1995 MLD 1097
Definition of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 392/34 and 324/34 Evidence Parade was held about six weeks after the arrest of the accused and no explanation was offered by the prosecution for the delay, t…
- ABDUL RAHIM v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1102
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 20 Explosive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 Definition of Evidence as evidence against the two co-accused (the offenders) and the con…
- RIAZ AHMAD v. STATE 1995 MLD 1110
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 18/10 (3) The FIR had an unequivocally significant delay of eight days. The complainant failed to explain the conduct of his close rela…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. STATE 1995 MLD 1114
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 The value of the evidence and the total amount of it was not presented to the court, therefore, it was alleged that 850 grams of heroin was …
- AZIZ AHMAD v. STATE 1995 MLD 1134
Order of Prohibition (Enforcement Limits) 1979 Article 4 Evidence Defined The police did not attempt to comply with the provisions of section 103, CRPC section 1565, affecting the recovery of heroin f…
- MUHAMMAD KALEEM v. STATE 1995 MLD 1152
The Importance of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 510 Chemical Examiner's Report Neither the police officer nor the courts are exp…
- ARBAB ALI v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1272
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Testimony of Evidence Prohibited the Recovery of 30 grams of Heroin Even though the sample was received at the Chemical Examiner's office wi…
- ZUBAIDA v. STATE 1995 MLD 1517
The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the value of section 317 evidence that the girl belonged to the accused and dumped her in t…
- NUSRATULLAH v. STATE 1995 MLD 1635
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 161 and 162 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Use of the statements under Sectio…
- PUNHAL v. STATE 1995 MLD 1642
Pakistan Penal Code Section 392 Definition of Evidence Defendant's charge against the accused was faulty Prosecution witnesses repeated each other on several key points, including allegedly filing an …
- DOST MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1995 MLD 1650
Pakistan Penal Code Section 636363 Definition of evidence No eyewitness or direct evidence was available nor were the kidnappers recovered nor did they appear as witnesses in this case Evidence shows …
- ABDUL NABI v. STATE 1995 MLD 1658
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (3) Appreciating Evidence The confessions made by the accused were contradictory and unacceptable and other evidence of the prosecu…
- MUHAMMAD ARIF v. STATE 1995 MLD 1680
Prohibition (Enforcement Haid) Order 1979 Article 3 (1) (a) Definition of evidence. The prosecution's witnesses provided direct and reliable evidence regarding the identity of the accused, who was not…
- MUMTAZ HUSSAIN v. STATE 1995 MLD 1686
The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/11/16 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 451/366/109/34 Investigating the evidence, the trial court found all th…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1995 MLD 1700
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 103 and 165 (4) Prohibited (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), not complying with Article 4 Section 103, CRPC the statement of the prosecution's witness wa…
- MUHAMMAD NAZEER v. STATE 1995 MLD 1704
The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 20 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), the testimony of section 392 as a testimony to the officer was the result of a misunders…
- SULEMAN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1712
Article 10 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Moto Review The accused was subjected to adultery and he was never a voluntary party; That he was acquitted. The co-accused, but he did n…
- MUHAMMAD ISHTIAQ v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1736
Prosecution of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Evidence was attacked for 26 weeks when it was charged in the FIR with the accused responsible for the attack. Adultery was…
- YOUSUF v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1739
There was no evidence on the record of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (2) and 16 of the evidence to prove the accused's escape with his accomplice, or by him. Was …
- MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1742
Prohibition of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Evidence Examination The prosecutor woke up at 1am at night, wearing his shoes and taking home the alarm with no alarm. Come on…
- MUNIR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1745
The prosecution's prosecution changed the timing of the prosecution in the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (3), and its testimony was not proved by medical evidence, as…
- SHAUKAT ALI v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1749
Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Trial Court issued proceedings against the accused without understanding that they were kept in…
- MUNIR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1751
The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Investigating the Evidence Prosecutor and his mother did not support the prosecution case against the accused while…
- SALEEM v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1788
Penalty for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Sentencing, the culprits of the accused were not challenged to be punished and only appropriate reduction of punishment was sought…
- EIDIEN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1885
The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Conduct Code (XLV, 1860), Sections 452, 148, 365 and 344, substantiated the allegation that the kidnapper was m…
- ABDUL KHALIL v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1894
The Criminal Procedure of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 16 and 10 (2) The evidence was taken by the accused that the abductor was his wife and the accused was not kept on record …
- LAL KHAN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1897
Document for proof of appreciation of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hoodo) Ordinance 1979 s, 10 (2), which is available on record of Family Court and High Court decisions, that the female accuse…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. STATE 1995 MLD 1986
Prohibited (Enforcement of Heads) Order 1979 Arts 3, 4 and 27 (1), appeals for the second time before the Federal Shariat Court for the second time under the conviction under Article 3 of the RI Artic…
- MUHAMMAD ISRAEEL ALIAS NIKKU v. STATE 1995 MLD 1988
Pakistan Penal Code Section 777777 ????? Definition of evidence Two days delay in filing the FIR was not fatal in the prosecution case as the victim was a five-year-old boy. His father went to work in…
- ATLAS KHAN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1996
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article Article 3 The value of the evidence was acquitted of the accused, therefore, transporting a large amount of heroin crime and the sentence of the accused was…
- MUHAMMAD NASIR v. STATE 1995 MLD 1999
Attentions 230 / / & & 39 2 ?? Eyewitnesses, including the complainant, have alleged that they fired at the victim with their pistol, both sides did not come to the truth, but evidence Grain can be re…
- MUKHTAR AHMAD v. STATE 1995 MLD 2011
Section 2 (b) r 9 369 and 1111 Off Crime of Enforcement (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979 1979), Validation of Section 10 (3) / 18 Evidence for the last time in the company of the accused. The…
Other years — Federal Shariat Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.