Sections 10 (2) and 14 of the lawsuit were filed by the petitioner against the trial court's order for Lee - the action between the petitioner and his wife Petitioner, in a deserted FIR That the co-accused used to come to him. FIR enters adultery for home and adultery purpose FIR's contents clearly showed that the applicant had made serious allegations of adultery against his wife and the High Court responsible woman was examined He was repeated before being taken to the hospital for. The applicant was made solely to lay charges against him for adultery without any ambiguity in the final medical report that the defendant had given birth to a child and it was beyond any doubt that the applicant had committed her The wife was charged with adultery against the trial court, in the circumstances it was legally correct to order Lee was The prosecution of Gaddaf against the applicant (Enforcement Head) Ordinance 1979, in the absence of any weakness in the proceedings. Nevertheless, the trial court's order cannot be amended to interfere. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
