Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 2000
40 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 2000.
- GHULAM ASGHAR v. STATE 2000 PLD 1
Any court or tribunal of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 203G, including the Supreme Court of Pakistan and a High Court, shall enjoy any action or jurisdiction or jurisdiction in relation to…
- STATE v. ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN NIAZI 2000 PCRLJ 7
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 7 Prohibition Prohibition Order (Enforcement of the Order of 1979), Appeal against prosecution against section / / itt Britt by the trial court to dismiss the a…
- SAHIB KHAN v. STATE 2000 PLD 63
Section 10 (3) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hoodo) Ordinance 1979 (Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VII of 1961), section 5) Definition of Proof of Defiance Marriage was claimed that the girl was age 16 …
- TARIQ MAHMOOD v. THE STATE 2000 PCRLJ 226
Criminalization of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Definition of Evidence The female accused did not attain the age of 16 on the date of marriage with her co-accused and adul…
- MAHBOOB v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 260
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 426 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (2) witnesses examined by the defendants in their defense, gave contradictory and …
- GUL REHMAN v. STATE 2000 MLD 270
Sections 364, 243 and 342 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) Order (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 Confession statement given by the accused, non-fulfillment of the mandatory provisions o…
- AMIR HAYAT v. STATE 2000 MLD 286
The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Contempt of Regulations (XLV of 1860), the affirmation of the provisions of Sections 452 and 506 was unacceptable to the victim. …
- NOSHI v. STATE 2000 MLD 302
Criminal Code of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Definition of Section 103 Evidence Despite the prior notification received by the Investi…
- MAQSOOD AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR 2000 MLD 313
The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 11 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), section 417 Appeal against the abuser of the abductor's father, cannot be expected to…
- RAWATO v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 333
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, section 10 (3) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the explanation for the delay in the enrollment of section 109 FIR was given to the tutor a…
- MUNIR AHMAD v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 374
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 103 Recovery Procedure Mandatory provisions of Section 103, CCPC Appropriate 20kg wet opium raid retrieval si…
- MUHAMMAD ABDUL QADOOS TARIQ v. STATE 2000 MLD 386
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Validating Evidence Presence of Unsupervised School Leaving Certificate in the Judicial Record, The Trial Court Record was silent on…
- MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. STATE 2000 MLD 411
The Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 did not prove allegations of drug sale and sale by the prosecution as evidence of the Arts 3 and 4 evidence, only 1 25 of which was heroin and 70 were fou…
- KHAN ZAMAN v. THE STATE 2000 PCRLJ 447
Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Definition of Evidence Prosecution's witness failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of the accused…
- MAHAZULLA v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 534
Sections 237 and 236 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), S363 The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 14 offender was charged with but punishable unde…
- BAZ MUHAMMAD v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 553
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b), 392 and 338 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 constitute DD offenses, subject to Chapter 345, CRPC as well as Chapter XVI of Pakistan Penal Code, a…
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. STATE 2000 MLD 651
Defining the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 392, 412 and 452 cannot be both a robbery nor a crime convicted of robbery unless the section 9090, by a criminal under the PPC jurisdiction. …
- MUHAMMAD ALI ALIAS MAMOON v. THE STATE 2000 PCRLJ 774
The Pakistan Penal Code section 392 definition of evidence relates to a delay of four days in recording witness statements under section 161, was not explained by the CCP prosecution complainant and t…
- MALIK AMAN v. FIDA MUHAMMAD 2000 PCRLJ 796
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 law requires the holding of the testimony (Article 10 of 1984), Article 22 Identity Parade only in cases where the witness is merely momentarily glimpse of the accu…
- ALAM ZEB v. THE STATE 2000 PCRLJ 815
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Definition of Evidence Before the trial court, the stand that his co-accused accused him of adultery was unlawful, yet with the …
- SAID BAHADUR SHAH v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 850
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 14 was charged with the crime of adultery but without formal accusation, the victim was bought or employed for the purpose…
- JUMA KHAN v. THE STATE 2000 YLR 951
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 397 and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), 5 397 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (IOC of 1965), Section 13E Property Against Crime (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Sect…
- AFZAAL AHMAD v. THE STATE 2000 YLR 960
Definition of Proof of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3)…
- ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N.-W.F,P., PESHAWAR v. ZAFAR IQBAL 2000 MLD 965
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 337F (i) and 34/377 Offenses (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Article 18 Constitution of Pakistan 1973), Article 13 Criminal Code of Conduct (V of 1898), Sectio…
- KALSOOM v. BASHIR AHMAD 2000 PCRLJ 1054
Criminal offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Appeal against trial of acquittal in acquittal of accused under Section 417 Section 265 K, C…
- NIZAMUDDIN v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 1176
The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the prosecution's evidence was presented by the defendant in the appreciation of sect…
- BASHIR MASIH v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 1615
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/16 contradicts the Defendant's testimony in the evidence and in the complainant's statements during the trial, he did not present a…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. MUHAMMAD IRSHAD 2000 PCRLJ 1756
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 417 Appeal against the prosecution witnesses named in the testimony of four witnesses to the …
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. THE STATE 2000 PCRLJ 1770
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 377 cases of testimonial testimony were reported immediately and no attempt was made to apprehend any innocent person, even though the prosecution's witnesses were exam…
- LAL BAKHSH v. THE STATE 2000 YLR 1871
Definition of Proof of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (a) and 10 (2) The trial court of adulthood did not consider the adulthood proven by the medical certificate, relying on th…
- ZAFAR IQBAL v. THE STATE 2000 YLR 1897
Constitution of Pakistan 1956 Article 3/4 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), 5 382B Failure to provide benefit of Article 382B during detention period, CRPC accused while delivering conviction and se…
- MUHKUMUDDIN v. THE STATE 2000 PCRLJ 1910
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 21 Definition of Evidence / Rigging / Stoning cattle Animal Theft None of the lawyers spoke word of theft by the accused, the trial co…
- GHAZI v. THE STATE 2000 YLR 1973
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 16 The value of the evidence was on the adulteration commission of the Adulteration Solidarity, which was not credible beca…
- RASOOL BAKHSH v. STATE 2000 PCRLJ 1975
The Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 3 (2), by virtue of the value of the evidence, the prosecution is not obliged to examine every witness of the crime, nor taken any negative ind…
- MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LIMITED v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE, FAISALABAD 2000 PCRLJ 1989
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, sections 11 and 16, were not collected during the investigation by the police, nor were they presented to the trial court in support of the pr…
- HABIBULLAH ALIAS BHUTTO v. THE STATE 2000 PCRLJ 2046
Definition of section 21 (2) of the evidence was against the accused in that he protected the robbers and their accomplices, and filed section 21 (2) of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Ahad) …
- HIDAYATULLAH v. THE STATE 2000 YLR 2330
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 and 11 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 458 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 512 Definition of Evidence R…
- MAQSOOD AHMED v. THE STATE 2000 YLR 2785
Prohibited (Order) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Evidence Definition The chemical examiner's report was not available at the time of the investigation of the prosecution's witnesses, in order to inquir…
- BARKAT v. THE STATE 2000 YLR 2807
Prohibited (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 435 The benefit of acquittal of the non-appealing accused, while the benefit of being acquitted, no …
- THE STATE v. GUL AFZAL 2000 YLR 3024
The appellate court acquitted the accused on the basis of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3/4 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Sections 417 (l) and 537 on the ground that the compl…
Other years — Federal Shariat Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.