TARIQ MAHMOOD versus MEHFOOZ HUSSAIN
Section 417 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 11 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 29 (2) (a) Appeal against delay in acquittal, Applicants / Appeals Humiliating the plaintiff, he claimed that because he was abroad at the time of the hearing of the improper decision and did not receive the information related to the decision of the case, he went back, obtained a certified copy of the improper decision. Applied to, but despite his best efforts he did not. It was provided and without the same applicant he preferred the appeal If any delay in filing the appeal can be repented, including a photostat copy of the applicant's passport, attached to the delay request The documents, it appeared at the time of the dastardly verdict, the applicant was away from the UK and upon returning to Pakistan, the applicant immediately requested to obtain a certified copy of the defective decision, which the applicant did not provide to him. was done. Following the urgency of the matter, the application for delay in filing an appeal was granted and the delay was condoned.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Barbar Loi lawyer