Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus STATE

Sections 302 and 34 of the Penal Code (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 2 (e), 5, 6 and 11 Definitions of Proof of Minor Of those convicted and only one was an adult while three others were minors because they had not attained the age of 18 at the time of their presence, under the provisions of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 a The child may be charged or tried in conjunction with an adult, and the ordinance provided a beneficial treatment for a juvenile. In view of the special provision of the law, it cannot be said that the trial of three juvenile offenders with an adult suspect did not result in any prejudice against them. The juvenile offender deserves to be treated unfairly and if the trial is not conducted accordingly, prejudice is sufficient. The clear case, run by the trial court, was illegal and a crime was recorded without jurisdiction over which three minor children could not be retained. The trial court has been assigned to the trial court for the accused's own trial or to file another additional sessions judge. The court, the court, was assigned with the powers of the Juvenile Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kunri lawyer