Find a Lawyer

ABID HUSSAIN versus STATE

Article 4 Evidence Testimony The suspect was arrested from a populated area and business time, but no independent witness was involved in proving the recovery of heroin / powder from the possession of the accused, in this case all three investigated. Witnesses told police authorities that the wrappers recovered from the possession of the accused were five grams, but they did not explicitly state how they allegedly possessed the heroin / powder and whether it was in fact All the police officers were fed, though they were witnesses like other witnesses, but, in the circumstances, their doubts Or a check should be checked because the police could not simply deny the possibility of false involved to show their performance, absence of independent witnesses other than the police officials also make doubtful the issue. The benefit of the doubt will reach the culprit and the accused was convicted by the trial court, they were set aside and they are ordered to be released. \ R \ n famous supreme court advocate from Tall lawyer