Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 1984
13 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 1984.
- RIAZ HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1984 PLD 1
Adultery of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 11 Adultery Prosecutors married the accused but did not go to his house, yet Rakshati was not charged as he forcibly took…
- MUMAMMAD ABBAS v. THE STATE 1984 PLD 3
Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 reads with sections 18 section 19 and 20 (1) exemptions (XLV of 1860), sections 302/34 and 449 for non-controversial prosecution because of very close events…
- MST. NEMAT BIBI v. THE STATE 1984 PLD 17
Section 5 (2) (a) of the Adultery (1979) Ordinance 1979 read with section 10 witnesses that the absence of a non-resident husband of the same village and the date of the victim's husband's marriage to…
- MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ v. THE STATE 1984 PLD 55
Adultery of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 and 16 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Zina Antique striking or delaying the filing of the first informatio…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. THE STATE 1984 PLD 57
Article 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Section 342 Medical Officer to See Eyes, Tricks and Wonders etc. S 341, (: r Prosecution, not to set a case under, not to set cases under and suspicion) A…
- MIAN ABDUL QADUS v. SAHIB ALI 1984 PLD 59
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 154 Adultery Bill Repression Delayed in the residence of parents of absentee prosecutors…
- MST. SIANI v. THE STATE 1984 PLD 69
It is possible that two interpretations of the provisions of the Ordinance 1979 1979 1979 3 and 7 of the last clause are possible, one was that the woman was kept by the accused as his wife and the ot…
- MUJEEB-UR-REHMAN v. FEDERAL GOVERMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ATTORNEY-GENERALOF PAKISTAN 1984 PLD 121
Pakistan Penal Code Section 315 Abortion prosecution does not prove that the accused girl was pregnant at the relevant time, something had been done before the birth of the child, which was calculated…
- SULEMAN v. STATE 1984 PCRLJ 1209
Married with Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Property (Enforcement Jewish) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Sections 6, 7, 17 and 20 of the Prohibition Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 392 abduction and adulter…
- MUMTAZ v. STATE 1984 PCRLJ 1316
Adulteration with section 11 and 10 was read about the offense of section 2 (a) of the Ordinance 1979 / Total (a) of section 2 of the ordinance, mean, adult, 16 years of age,…
- MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ v. STATE 1984 PCRLJ 1823
Qazf (Enforcement Border) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 and 11 Benefits of Doubts' Suspicion There is suspicion that a suspect has been charged with adultery if he has been charged with adultery, he may c…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. STATE 1984 PCRLJ 2762
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 377 Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10, 11, 12 The prosecution's witnesses make straightforward statements ab…
- SHAFA ULLAH v. STATE 1984 PCRLJ 3195
The Offense for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 12 Compensation Code (XLV of 1860), Section 377, violates the abduction complainant on charges of extremely low misconduct, which hav…
Other years — Federal Shariat Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.