Find a Lawyer

ISHFAQ HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 10 (2) / 16 Definition of Evidence The prosecution's case was that the female accused who was the daughter of the complainant was already married to another person and during the married marriage she went with the male accused and He started living a life of adultery; on the other hand, the request made by the two accused as soon as possible was that the woman was never married, according to the other person, according to the accused in the Sui court. He left his home against the wishes of his father / complainant and went to Karachi with the male accused. Where they entered the Halal marriage and were living as a married couple and had two children in the said marriage, in the absence of positive evidence, it cannot be said that the male accused allegedly participated in the female prosecution. The marriage did not prove. Any evidence that the accused woman and the alleged mate with another person turned out to be a false document that was created solely for the purpose of promoting the prosecution's case with the male accused. Her marriage was encouraged by the father of the woman accused. False in material details during examination as witness in court. She accused the false story of her daughter's forced abduction, saying that no one could be allowed to take advantage of her own fraud and fraud. That she left her home and left the house and during the interrogation they had already contacted the police at the appropriate time to marry the accused. On the contrary, the overweight male accused had initially requested that she not. You know family advocate from Garh Maharaja lawyer