Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus ZAFAR WARAICH

Complaints under Sections 200, 202, 190 (2), 435, 439 and 537 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 427/504/506 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) The dismissal of the case was filed before the Judicial Magistrate through the Complaint Complaint, but the Magistrate sent the Sessions Judge to the Sessions Judge as a crime under the Criminal Property Enforcement (Ordinance) Ordinance, 1979. The Special Sessions Judge of the court declared the hearing as special. The complaint was submitted by the Sessions Judge, proceedings were made to record the complainant's statement under Section 200, CCPC, and the complaint was forwarded to the Judicial Magistrate for further investigation, who, after some action, moved the matter to an additional session. Placed before the judge, who passed an order directing the accused in the complaint. Present it and explain the reasons why the complaint filed by the complainant should not be brought on the record and why should not be lodged against it, red and submit your objections in writing and finally the complaint Under the auspices of the Additional Sessions Judge, Section 202, under the provisions of the CR PC Trial Court (Additional Sessions Judge), could not be satisfied with the result of an inquiry conducted by the Judicial Magistrate at that time. The accused were summoned to appear before them in any capacity and it was grossly illegal by the Additional Sessions Judge to participate in the proceedings with the defendant / alleged accused during the investigation under Section 202, CR PC. Give them an opportunity to raise objections. Complaint in which he was charged, Additional Sessions Judge decided to settle the case. immigration advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer