MUHAMMAD ASHRAF ALIAS NAIK MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), defining section 10 (3) evidence was the statement of a witness who acquitted the accused and presented them before the defendant. And extra-judicial confession about his murder after committing adultery with his witness, the crime has substantially improved his statement before the police witness who was a common farmer and that person Was not the one who assumed the position of authority. The accused was not his co-villager. It seemed highly unlikely that the accused would go to a stranger while in another village and confess to the alleged crime, and he would also be in a position to provide no help in apologizing. Is or not The legacy of the deceased
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Theing Jattan More lawyer
