Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus THE STATE

Section 11 Evidence Defined The alleged abductor / victim, who was the star witness of the crime, was not presented at trial and no evidence was presented that the alleged abductor was forcibly taken away or committed adultery. Bill was subjected to coercion, the alleged kidnapper was killed after registration, his case and his recovery, but the record was silent as to when and why he was killed and for what reason. Who was responsible, especially in the case of adultery, especially the victim of the victim Xena Bill, was of great importance and because of the high identification value. In other cases, other evidence merely proves that his conviction, in practice, depends on his credibility and credibility, as far as the essential components belong to the trial court, even though the prosecution's review of the evidence Whether or not it bothered to investigate was sufficient, but a photocopy copy of the statement of the alleged abductor was recorded on the record by the prosecution, which was of no use to the prosecution, the testimony of the remaining witnesses was purely mat. Was verifiable and contradictory unless there was no direct or direct evidence available, the accused was punished in some other way. It cannot be based on fact, to be convinced that any event, in the present case, did not occur in such a way as the prosecution had failed to produce credential evidence, as was the case. For this reason, the accused should be punished and the sentence filed by the trial court against the accused was fixed. On the one hand, they were acquitted and released family advocate from Khangarh lawyer