Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

The testimony of section 10 (2) contradicts the facts stated in the FIR directly related to the incident victim's statement and the alleged victim's failure to recover the pistol and motorcycle used in the incident. The statement in the prosecution case on which the trial court sentenced the accused was not convincing; the story of a credible and trustworthy abduction is a lie. Anyone accused of committing adultery with an affected girl is one of the accused. Was not recovered. There was no conclusive evidence in the absence of any other contradictory evidence with the Prosecutor Chemical Examiner's report regarding the victim's vaginal shrubs. No evidence was available on record to link the suspect to the commission of the crime. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted. \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocates phone number from Mardan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes