Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD ALIAS TARA versus STATE

The complainant, accused of complimenting section 10 (2) evidence, had alleged in the FIR as the husband of the female accused that he found both the accused guilty of adultery with his wife for the past 8 years. / The woman had strained relations with the accused and he repeatedly asked her to abstain from the male suspect. The relationship between the complainant and the female accused was such that they could not reside under the same roof. After considering the entire evidence on record, it became clear that the complainant's allegations against both the accused appear correct. The allegations and the counter-allegations both blame the complainant and his wife / female defendants. During the arguments, a question was debated that the accused / male accused should be held responsible for all the devastation, but the female accused was his own Paramour cannot fully suffer from its relationship with the trial court. The complainant's evidence is believed and the two accused were subsequently convicted of female charges Ed was retained in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, but his sentence had already passed and he was sentenced. And the trial court convicted the co-accused / male accused \ r \ n law firms from Hala lawyer