Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SADIQ versus GOVERNEMT OF PAKISTAN

Article 203 D Appeal to the Federal Shariah Court challenging the difference in the rate of increase in the pension of government employees, the government increased the pensioners who retired before 1994 at a rate of 16%, while allowing an increase of 8% The pensioners who were retired afterwards were requested by the petitioner that the finance division could be directed to allow them to increase the pension at the rate of 16% instead of 8% which was already granted. He may have been referred to a term / pension after a release from employment. And the right to pension will depend on the legal rules that pensioners who regularly retire on different dates cannot claim to increase their pension at a particular rate because of the terms / conditions related to changing the pension rate in the future. There was no agreement between the pensioners and the government. , The distinction between `old pensioners 'and` new pensioners' was not to be void and every pensioner was entitled to take pension accordingly, the pension was considered as his own right under the law, its distribution. Inequality will not be considered un-Islamic and various rates cannot be declared discriminatory even otherwise, since the applicant failed to identify any law, custom or practice against May be infringed. Claims for Islamic Injections and Relief, which is in private, filed by the applicant were not eligible for hearing \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocate from Mastoi lawyer