Find a Lawyer

PIR IMTIAZ versus STATE

Section 10 (3) (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Articles 233, 236, 237 and 238 defining evidence by accusing one accused, but also for imposing sentence on other defendants for section 10 ( 3) charged under. The Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance was convicted in 1979 of adultery Bill Jaber for liability, but he was sentenced under section 10 (4) of the ordinance without modifying the charges, leaving the deadly Mark. The Enforcement of Adultery (Hood) Ordinance, 1979 states that the ordinance was restricted to those cases where the rule of constructive obligation was imposed, and this section is an important one. This ordinance is a crime against section 10 (3) as it has been sentenced to death while under this, the accused charged with a crime is given a twenty-five year rigorous imprisonment provided under section 10 (3) of the ordinance. Has been punished. der Section 237 or 238, CR PC can be found guilty of someone else, but since both said there are exceptions to the general rule contained in Article 233, CR PC, each person charged for a separate offense. A crime can be charged, it cannot be punished. Second, unless there is any doubt as to what crime was committed against the accused and the crime was confessed, or in the original part of it the attempt was made to commit the crime, on which the accused was actually charged. Provided under Sections 236 and 238, the CCP was not charged. The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) was charged under section 10 (4) of the Ordinance 1979, which was a serious offense in relation to section 10 (3) of the ordinance, and completely different facts under it. advocate for immigration from Kurram Agency lawyer