Federal Shariat Court — Judgments of 2012
37 reported judgments of the Federal Shariat Court from 2012.
- KHURRAM SHAHZAD v. State 2012 PLD 1
Appearing on the evidence of section 10 (3) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (c) adultery Bill, the affected girl at the age of three pointed the accused in the trial court and What he di…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2012 PCrLJ 11
Sections 10 (3) and 11 commit adultery, forcing a woman to abduct or marry, blaming Taseer. Evidence appreciated. It is alleged that her marriage was with the age of the alleged abductor, according to…
- IMDAD HUSSAIN v. State 2012 PLD 13
Section 514 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10/11/13/14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 203 DD guarantees for adultery, kidnapping, sale and forfeiture of p…
- AKHTAR HUSSAIN v. State 2012 MLD 262
Sections 10 and 11 define the evidence of rape and abduction, although the reduction of the accused was not designated in the FIR, but in its statement under section 164, the CCP abducted and raped th…
- IMRAN ASHRAF v. State 2012 YLR 325
Sections 302 (b) / 34 and 376 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Sections 10 and 11 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 265C (1) (d) Qatl e amd, Rape Dina, zina bil jab…
- MUHAMMAD QAISAR v. State 2012 YLR 387
The testimony of the Section 392 robbery was filed by the complainant in the FIR immediately after the incident, as well as the physical properties of the two accused were given to the FIR even though…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2012 PCrLJ 530
Section 12 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 77 Kid77 defining sodomy evidence for abduction or abduction of a person, giving the FIR details of the day's events on the same day. In which the accused …
- Mst. NADIA v. State 2012 PCrLJ 599
Section 6 426 Bail, Defendant's counsel denied that appellant's bail was sought on the basis that the female appellant with an infant infant at the age of nine months was in jail, which counsel for th…
- INAYAT v. State 2012 YLR 613
Section 20 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 395, 411, 458 and 149 of Haramba, robber, receiving fraudulently stolen property and appreciating evidence by concealing domestic crime delayed 8 day…
- MAZHAR v. State 2012 YLR 652
Section 10 adultery Bill Jaber praised the evidence The minor girl, aged 9-10, was subjected to forced sexual abuse through a forced complaint, an FIR filed immediately alleging that the accused had a…
- MUHAMMAD JAVED v. State 2012 YLR 695
Sections 10 (3) and 11 define the evidence of rape and abduction Victim reported to the police immediately after his recovery / return that he alleged that he had divorced her ex-husband. After taking…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM alias SAIF v. State 2012 PCrLJ 739
Sections 10 and 11 are liable for adultery or forcible trader and evidence of kidnapping. Was necessary. In the present case the affected girls, the element of taking or attracting a minor from retain…
- JAHAN ZEB v. State 2012 YLR 752
The 12th Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), the Section 377 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), the confirmation of the testimony of the Section 345, the suspicion of an increase in the incident wa…
- RASHID MINHAS v. MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ 2012 PCrLJ 816
Section 7 Off7 (Enforcement Body) Ordinance of Adultery (VII ofI Section 12), Section Cri Code Pro Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) Unlawful Crime / Minor Offense / Age 13/14 Appeal…
- ZULFIQAR ALI v. State 2012 YLR 847
Section 376 definition of rape evidence. The victim was subjected to adultery. It did appear, but it is natural that when she was unmarried and she naturally considered her future pressure against her…
- MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. State 2012 YLR 886
Section 10 (4) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) is responsible for the adulterous oppressor trader; Details were given, which naturally stated that the witnesses were examined …
- MUHAMMAD ARIF v. State 2012 YLR 918
Section 10 (2) adultery was responsible for the delay of approximately 36 hours to the filing of the FIR for appreciation of the evidence; it was not satisfactorily explained in the FIR, both witnesse…
- QAISAR MEHMOOD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 930
Sections 302 (b) and 364 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (4) Qatil Adm, kidnapping and kidnapping a man under the age of fourteen, trader for adultery The tes…
- IMRAN alias MANI v. State 2012 YLR 993
Responsible for affecting Section 10 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) / 34 of adultery, Qital Ahmed appreciating the evidence filed an FIR of double murder immediately and the ac…
- JAMEEL v. State 2012 YLR 1174
Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) Qatil-e-Amal, The Joint Intention Evidence Definition The benefit of the doubt was not available on the witness record of the incident and it was a blind murder and the case w…
- SOHRAB KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1442
Section 392 law in evidence (10 of 1984), the evidence of Article 40 robbery was delayed due to the police delaying the discovery notice in the registration of the Cageco FIR, which started the invest…
- SHABBIR AHMED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1491
Sections 392, 511 and 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 203c & 203d, appeal to the Federal Shariah Court for attempted robbery and joint intent. The accused filed an appeal in the High Court ag…
- SHER ZAMAN v. THE STATE 2012 MLD 1601
Section 2 342 and Property 39 Against Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) Definition of false imprisonment, robbery, forbidden evidence was also visible to…
- NADEEM v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1629
Sections 10 and 16 are the responsibility of the businessman on adultery; he is accused of luring or detaining a woman with criminal intent or detaining or detaining him. Evidence exists between the a…
- SAID RASOOL v. SAJID 2012 PCrLJ 1699
Section 17 (4) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) of the Commission's definition of proof of evidence against the evil in Harabah that occurred at night, was anonymous and there was …
- MAQSUD AHMAD alias SUDI v. State 2012 YLR 1954
In section 7, 16 and 17 (3) of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), the accused accused of defining the testimony of section 164 Harabah was found guilty only on his confessional statement, which was withdraw…
- JAVAID v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2013
Section 17 (4) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX-1965), Section 13 Harabah, during which the murder is committed, the definition of unlicensed weapons was defined as mere proof of the case witho…
- HIMMAT ALI v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2079
Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed did not commend the allegations nor was specifically designated by the complainant in the FIR, nor did the investigating officer, in his statement recorded at the trial, …
- Qari ABDUR RASHEED v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2142
Section 10 (3) adultery Bill Jabbar blamed Tasheer for defining the evidence The Medico Legal Report, Chemical Examiner's Reports and the Lady Doctor's court-wide prosecution supported that the two vi…
- SAIFULLAH v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2173
Section 17 (4) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 412 Harabah that resulted in the assassination, dishonestly acquiring property in the commission of a robber, the benefit of suspecting the va…
- MUHAMMAD SHAFI alias SAKHI MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 YLR 2302
Section 10 (): Adultery Bill Jaber, Sentence Punishment Responsible for Defining Evidence, Defendant's Lawyer's Lawyer Pledged to Reduce Sentence After Reduction of Sentence Re-examining the case alre…
- SULEMAN v. State 2012 YLR 2395
Sections 302 and 380 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 5 murder A burglary in the residence of a noble, residential house, although it was anonymous and no eviden…
- MUHAMMAD JAMSHAID v. State 2012 YLR 2455
Arts 3 and 4 Define the manufacture, transport, and proof of possession of drug paraphernalia Even if certain drugs were for sale, the possession of the holder is required under the Prohibited Order 4…
- MUMTAZ AHMAD v. State 2012 YLR 2529
Section 10 (4) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 377/109/34/292, is responsible for adultery, sale of books of profanity, profanity, prostitution, etc. Definition of dishonesty and comm…
- NASEEB ULLAH v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2570
Section 2 (2 (b) and Q 34 Qatal) FIR was registered in a case against two unidentified persons with a joint intention and the accused was later sentenced by a supplementary statement based on the info…
- NOOR ULLAH v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2618
The Section 395 dossier testified that the three prosecution witnesses were police officers, taking advantage of the suspect's testimony when no reason was given by the prosecutor in this regard, so t…
- MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2871
Section 6868/1 47 Z and 4 494 Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979 1979), Section 10 (2) to be used as a forged document for fraudulent purposes, During the life of the husband…
Other years — Federal Shariat Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1981
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.