Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ MASIH versus STATE

Article 2 30un Qanuni testimony (1984 1984 of the ten), Section evidencere evidence was credible and no name was registered in the FIR nor there is any suspicion that the accused was killed. Who was already in police custody. In another case, he allegedly confessed to his crime and disclosed it to the police regarding the murder of the accused in accordance with the law in Article 38 of the Martyrdom, in 1984 the police under Article The officer allegedly challenged the accused to confess to the crime. The law could not prove to be a confession of guilt before the 38 police officers of this testimony, 1984, the evidence of the recovery of any crime or weapon is evidence of complete conviction in itself, the absence of any direct or concrete evidence. In the presence, it was not enough to bring domestic charges against the accused, especially when neither the serologist nor the chemical examiner's reports were presented nor any evidence was presented to prove that the knife was found in the blood. He had a scar and if so, he had human blood on it and he belonged to the same group that was slaughtered until he had a proven or direct cause. Services not available evidence, conviction can not be based on any other type. Evidence, whether it is proven that the prosecution failed miserably to prove his case against the accused and there is scope for doubt, would have the benefit of going to the accused and the sentence against the accused could not be sustained and He was released and the accused was acquitted law websites from Pindi gheb lawyer