Find a Lawyer

QAISER versus THE STATE

The definition of evidence in Sections 10 (3), 11 and 16 as the story of the abduction as described by the victim was absolutely incredible if there was a forced abduction and that too at 2 pm (afternoon). I resisted it. The victim's statement about the instability and instability in this case, using potential force to raise the alarm and to prevent her from being abducted, was attracted to the incident and saw that the victim girl Has been dragged into a car parked there. The prosecution's witness made no attempt to rescue the child when he was forcibly dragged, if that were the case, he or anyone, for that matter, would have raised the alarm and saved the infected child. I try to do everything possible. After seeing the alleged incident, he went away and no incident was reported to any Victim girl. In his investigation, he admitted that all his members were present at the house at the relevant time if he resisted. There would have been at least some color and their captives or neighbors would have been attracted to the place and allegedly tried to thwart the abduction, but there was nothing that reflected its circumstances to a great extent. Was. The victim was not abducted by the accused because she alleged that the affected girl entered into a marriage with her, but the girl did not accept her authenticity with her marriage. Had proven that he did not marry the accused, but the prosecution alleged that the girl was forced to abduct her. top advocate from Malakand lawyer