Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD ASHRAF versus STATE

The defendant commended in his statement under Section 342, CCPC, that he had entered into an exact contract with the victim on the marriage under section 342, CCPC. The IR was registered while the alleged marriage took place in the SFIR police station area. Fourteen days before the alleged marriage, which clearly proved the prosecution's case, after the abduction, the alleged marriage took place and it has been substantiated that the accused committed adultery without having a valid wife. Was committing, alleging that he had contracted a valid marriage contract. The victim, who fell to the ground, in the circumstances in which the alleged accomplice appeared on behalf of the victim in the marriage, also proved on the record evidence that the trial court had tried to convict and convict the accused. The decision was completely proved. And his co-accused was legitimate and no legal weakness was found in the invalid verdict. us immigration advocates from Mari Indus lawyer