Find a Lawyer

NADEEM versus THE STATE-

Definition of proof of section 12 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (a), 377 and 201 of last seen evidence; the conduct of the accused immediately after the alleged incident took place. Recovery of the body on the suspect's identity. The recovery of the victim's shoes; and the evidence of the medical evidence prosecutor's last time being dead in the company of the accused was impressive and true; Syed's witness had no intention of falsely involving the accused in this case. , There was no reason for the effectiveness of the trial incident. The testimony of the witness was not open to any suspicion; in addition to being based on the final evidence, the strength of the accused in the case, the defendant's acquittal, was soon supported by the accused, who was accompanied by the first deceased. After being seen, he returned alone and, after being questioned to reveal the child who died, panicked, instead of responding, he ran away and disappeared in the bushes. His conduct had greatly helped the prosecution's version of his involvement in the crime. Recovering the deceased's dead body and the last-worn shoe on the suspect's identity, there were other important circumstances to prove his guilt, but the evidence of his crime fully supported the medical evidence. The prosecutor's version of the victim, who was subjected to sodomy and then strangled to death, told The Chemical Examiner's report that since the incident, anal swabs were stained with mini-chains when the victim's recovery. The accused was abducted by Upon his request, the body of the deceased and the shoes, the pieces of evidence were left to provide complete and conclusive evidence of the crime of the accused. best advocate from Sanghi lawyer