Lahore High Court Lahore — Judgments of 2002

2,010 reported judgments of the Lahore High Court Lahore from 2002 — page 15 of 21.

• Dr. SAMEENA ASGHAR v. Rana AMJAD, S.H.O. POLICE STATION GULSHAN-E-RAVI, LAHORE 2002 YLR 1835

  Before the arrest of Section 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 656565, the complainant had a tendency to file false cases against the accused on the basis of false pretenses between th…

• Chaudhri NAZIR AHMED ASAD, F. C.A. v. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF PAKISTAN 2002 CLD 1835

  Chartered Accountants Ordinance 1961 Shadow II, Part 1, CL (1) Chartered Accountants' Allowance, 1983, By-Law 8 (3) Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Sections 254, 255 and 257 Securities and Exchan…

• Maj. (Rtd.).ISHTIAQ MAHMOOD v. Mst. ZAREEN GUL 2002 CLC 1838

  Section 9 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964, under the Ordinance of the West Pakistan Family Laws, 1961, R3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), the petition for restoration of the Art 199 Constitu…

• ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR-II, (ADJUDICATION), CUSTOMS HOUSE, LAHORE v. AHSAN & COMPANY 2002 PTD 1839

  Additional evidence before the jurisdiction over the appellate tribunal's permission of the Sales Tax Act 1990 section 2 (1) and 47 Customs Act (IV of 1969), raising the question of law in the appeal …

• SARDAR ALI v. Mst. SAFIA BIBI 2002 YLR 1841

  Section 497 (5) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Rule 392/394/411 bail cancellation accused was not named in the FIR and she was involved in the case for the first time in more than three years, …

• TAHIR KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1843

  Defining the evidence of being one of the victims of Section 302 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 attacks certainly looked at the attacker who attacked him and his two Companions, who die…

• KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. MONOPOLY CONTROL AUTHORITY 2002 CLD 1844

  Monopolies and Restricted Business Practices (Control and Prevention) Sections 3, 4 (b), 11, 12 (1) (a) (iii) of the Ordinance 1970 and 20 unnecessary concentration of economic power mill Technical in…

• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. ZULFIQAR ALI 2002 MLD 1844

  Sections 36 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 (1973), Article 199 Appointment of a Lumberman Constitutional application On the death of a limber, applications for fresh appointment ag…

• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. ABDUL REHMAN 2002 MLD 1847

  Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 137 and Schedule [which was amended by the Punjab Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance (VII 2001]] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Contrac…

• DILNAWAZ v. Miss AMBAR GULL KHAN 2002 CLC 1850

  Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 7, 14 & 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction The High Court scope suit does not have the author…

• PRINCE FLYING COACH, FAISALABAD v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2002 CLC 1852

  Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Amendment Ordinance (XII of 1972), the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court under section 199 of section 3 of the Constitution, completely denied the…

• MAUJ ALI v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1854

  Section 2 302/34 Acc // 1099 Acc Accused was placed in column number 1 in column number of challan, summoned by the trial court to stand trial, while admitting the crime on the police report, Knowledg…

• RIAZ AHMAD v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1855

  The defendants were named in the FIR under Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 24/34/34, which supported their role as well as the purpose of prosecution. Went to the prosecutor'…

• ALI IMRAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1856

  Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/392/34 FIR was lodged in a busy street of the city without sufficient delay due to the testimony of evidence and the two accused were specially designated. Such fac…

• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1857

  The testimony of Section 302 (b) was corroborated by the medical evidence cogent molecular evidence, and the recovery evidence admitted that it caused the victim to have fireworks injuries, but a diff…

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXI WEALTH TAX, FAISALABAD v. MOHSIN & CO, RICE DEALER, LAHORE ROAD, CHINIOT 2002 PTD 1858

  Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 12 (18) and 136 (1) Applicable to the Income Tax Determination The question of the fact that was received as a debt dispute was that a certain amount of money was pa…

• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. GHULAM RASOOL 2002 MLD 1860

  Under Sections 18, 42 and 54 of the Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V12 of 1912), Section 10 and 19 of the Transfer Property Act (1V of 1882), section 554 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908)…

• GLAMOUR TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE CANTT v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE (ADJUDICATION), LAHORE 2002 PTD 1860

  Sales Tax Act 1990 Section 47 notification number section R578 (I), dated 12 6 1998, reference to a High Court order passed by the appellate tribunal, failure to state the reason for the order passed …

• NAZIR AHMAD v. Mst. MAJEEDA BEGUM 2002 CLC 1862

  Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R 11 of CPC Planet O VII, R 11] After the plaintiff's request for a retrial is dismissed, the plaintiff refuses to stand trial, appearing at the admission stage before …

• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1862

  Section 2 (2 (b) / & evidence and definition of evidence) 111111 The presence of natural witnesses on the occasion and their meeting with the deceased accompanying the accused was established at the s…

• MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. JAHANGIR AHMAD 2002 CLC 1865

  Section 122 and 123 of the Property Act, 1882, transfer of gifts, the necessary accessories for the correct gift, three factors must be established. Offer by first donor; acceptance by second and deli…

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/ WEALTH TAX, FAISALABAD ZONE, FAISALABAD v. Sh. MUHAMMAD ALI 2002 PTD 1865

  Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 136 (1) Appeal to High Court Self Assessment Scheme Question of fact The appellate tribunal, contrary to the finding of the authorities, concluded that the Assisi was…

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME/WEALTH TAX COMPANIES ZONE-III, LAHORE v. DR. FAROOQ SAEED KHAN, C/O FAROOQ HOSPITAL, ALLAMA IQBAL TOWN, LAHORE 2002 PTD 1870

  Appeal Ordinance 1979 Sections 59 (1B), 66A, 136 (1) (Amended) and 156 Appeal Law before the High Court were reviewed by the amendment of the dispute in the house under construction. Was related to in…

• COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE TAX, WATER COMPANIES ZONE III, LAHORE v. STATE LIFE 2002 PTD 1874

  Section 136 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 136 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, instead of referring to the High Court, had the jurisdiction to appeal the High Court Revenue, as it exist…

• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. ABDUL HAQ 2002 CLC 1875

  The trial court for a specific performance of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 suit agreement ruled that the case was affirmed, but neither of these two decisions can be said to have been made b…

• FARRAKH SHAHZAD v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1875

  Testimony of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/34 Evidence was fully proved by the eyewitnesses to the incident that it was the accused who shot and killed the deceased and proved the purpose of the…

• FAIZ AHMED v. KHAN MUHAMMAD 2002 MLD 1876

  In the case of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 declaration, the original owner of the property, who was in the interests of the parties, survived his widow, and a daughter, defendant, was confi…

• HONG KONG CHINESE RESTAURANT, MAIN BOULEVARD GULBERG, LAHORE v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6, LAHORE 2002 PTD 1878

  Sections 135, 136 and 156 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Appeal by Appeal to the Review Question set by the High Court = Appeal against the original order filed instead of reviewi…

• ALI AHMAD v. THE STATE 2002 MLD 1884

  Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/307/34/149 The definition of evidence was a natural witness and its testimony regarding the incident in which the accused were killed, confidence was created, and cred…

• MUHAMMAD ASLAM SHAH v. PAK ELECTRON (PVT.) LTD 2002 CLC 1887

  Civil Procedure Code Order XVII and XVII, R3 and O XXXVII, Rr 2, 3 and Section 115 of the CPC Adjustments Proof of closure of the evidence The defendants with regard to the jurisdiction of the restora…

• GUL BAHAR KHAN alias BHAKKAR KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1894

  Appreciating the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/353/395/396/34 The accused had been identified by two members of the police party and another person in the same evidence brought on re…

• IJAZ AHMAD v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1894

  Section 2302 (b) / ????? 34 Definition of Evidence In this case, there was an immediate demand for a reduction in the FIR, which excluded the possibility of any consultation and consideration. The ocu…

• ALLAH DITTA v. FAZAL MUHAMMAD 2002 CLC 1894

  Sections 3 (5) and 30 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Article 10 Cell The amount of premature occupancy settlement was paid partially with the delivery of occupation The amount of the delimitation count …

• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2002 MLD 1895

  Pakistan Penal Code Section 440/447/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR Extraction Charges / Applicants had earlier filed a civil case in which they claimed that they had a contro…

• Mian KAMAL ANWAR, SARGODHA ROAD FAISALABAD v. INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2002 PTD 1895

  Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 59 and 136 (1) CBR Circular No. 1 (3) DT 14/91, Dated 1 4 1991 Selection of Case for Cell Assessment Scheme Audit, Selection of Case under Audit 5 4 1991 Subsequentl…

• ALI MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD TUFAIL 2002 CLC 1900

  Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 Section 34 (2) Punjab Pre-Emission Act (Constitution of 1913), Section 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), ONI, R11 Coquitations of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutio…

• Chaudhary AAMIR ALI v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1902

  Sections 9 (a) (v) / 10 (a) and 14 C were defined as evidence for the possession of the property acquired by the accused, but according to him it was not obtained as a result of any misuse of powers. …

• BAHAWAL BAKHSH v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1902

  Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 114/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Definition of Section 9 Evidence There is no dispute between the ocular account and the medical evidence, the names o…

• Mst. SAKINA BIBI v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1914

  Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the Corruption Prevention Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) define the interchange of evidence that was allegedly executed by an attorney who, in favor of the accused, o…

• FAYYAZ KHALIQ alias PAPPU v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1922

  The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/460/34/109 affirmation of FIR definition was filed with the FIR, promptly and the accused was specifically designated as the main culprit. Had suffered an isola…

• NASIR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1927

  Section 2?2 (b) and 3 353 Ocular Account of Evidence Appraisal did not affect trust Eyewitnesses were unable to observe the characteristics of the suspect at the time of the incident due to darkness a…

• AMANULLAH KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1934

  The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34/109 evidence was a daily occurrence and an FIR was immediately filed. All the accused were specially named and the complainant filed his moth…

• MUHAMMAD AYUB v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1944

  Section 302 (b) Appraising evidence The presence of eyewitnesses at the relevant time was not challenged at the relevant time, no matter their relationship and their victim, fully supported by the med…

• SHAHID KHAN v. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE/RETURNING OFFICER 2002 MLD 1945

  Punjab Local Government Election Ordinance 2000 Section 2 (10) Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, R70 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition challenged on the …

• MUKHTAR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1948

  In view of the value of the section 302 (b) evidence, the witnesses fully affirmed each other on all material points, and their evidence was influenced by the belief that they were Eve's uncle and fat…

• Rai BASHARAT SAJJAD v. NAWAZ 2002 PCRLJ 1954

  The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) of the evidence has been hurt by the prosecution on both the accused, but according to the doctor's observation, the possibility c…

• MUHAMMAD WAZIR v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1961

  Arts 3 and 4, Case 2 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 30, 439 and 561 Cushing's Cushing case was ordered by the Additional Sessions Judge to be referred to a 1994 trial, but the trial took…

• THE STATE v. ABDUL SATTAR 2002 YLR 1964

  Section 2302/3 353 / Cri 34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 417 (1), the appeal against the complainant was a police officer himself but did not explain the role of the assailants in the FIR and Ocul…

• Ch. ARFAN JABBAZ alias Ch. ZAFAR IQBAL v. Mst. RIZWANA JABEEN 2002 CLC 1964

  Section 1 (2) of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance and 9 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Article 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutio…

• ANWAR-BAIG v. THE STATE 2002 PCrLJ 1965

  Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/338 D / 34 was accused of praising the evidence that he was the son of the deceased's father-in-law and that the hotel in front of the incident was with the relatives o…

• BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE v. Miss GHAZALA ROOHI 2002 MLD 1966

  According to the civil court's jurisdiction, the decision to fix the date of birth of a candidate suit for the Special Relief Act 1877 sec 42 Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act (…

• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. PRESIDENT, SUMMARY MILITARY 2002 PCRLJ 1970

  Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The accused were alleged that the fake entries made by Patwari in RL II were confirmed when they Patwari, w…

• NEIMAT ULLAH KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1972

  The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 definition of evidence, reduction of sentence was immediately filed FIR giving all the necessary details in filing F: all possibilities of fake conspiracy by IR …

• ALLAH DITTA v. LAKHA 2002 CLC 1974

  Sections 4 and 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 pre-emption, proof of joint ownership of the co-owner and partner, not to mention the assessment of the land revenue, pre-emperors claimed on thei…

• RASHEED AHMAD v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1976

  Section 364/302/201/297 Conan Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 43 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 555 The termination of an action was not designated in the FIR and they were involved in the case. The s…

• QAMAR-UD-DIN v. THE STATE 2002 MLD 1976

  Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/11 Bail, Further Investigation Grants of the Inquiry Examined and Incomplete I…

• SHABBIR AHMED v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1980

  Section 7777 ????? Testimonies of testimony In this case, no material contradiction or contradiction was identified in the evidence of the prosecution because of the false allegations of the accused, …

• THE STATE v. MUHAMMAD AKBAR 2002 YLR 1987

  Eyewitnesses, including the complainant on appeal against the section 2302 / Cri 34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 417 (1), were confirmed on material points, the recovery was disclosed by independe…

• ABDUL HAQ alias MIRZA v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1989

  Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 bail, although the defendant's grant was present at the relevant time, he did not play a significant role in the crime and did not have any recourse to the …

• LIAQAT ALI v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1992

  Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Definition of evidence Punishment, lack of accused was immediately designated in the FIR filed, the parties were closely related and the accused or alternatives except …

• Mst. BALQEES v. SIKANDAR HAYAT 2002 MLD 1993

  Section 7 of the Pakistan (Administration for Evacuation Property) Act, 1957, is in dispute with the transferor of the property which is actually the owner of the eviction, the purchase was made by th…

• GHULAM RASOOL v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 1996

  Definitions of sections 302/34, 120b / 34 and 324/34 evidence were filed immediately and the conspiracy was proved by independent and irrevocable evidence at the time of the incident. The presence of …

• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 1996

  The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/34 definition of evidence was a daylight case and a special FIR was lodged against the accused for causing fatal injury to the victim and the defendant's guilt.…

• SHARAM v. TAJ MUHAMMAD 2002 CLC 2001

  Section 5 Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act (XXXVI of 1979), Section 2 Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act (IX of 1948) Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act (…

• HABIB-UR-REHMAN v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 2003

  The Pakistan Penal Code Section 381A / 411 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), defining Section 7 evidence, was against the accused alleging that he had stolen a car outside the mosque in his cross-ex…

• STATE v. HAYATULLAH 2002 YLR 2012

  Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 439 sentencing plea for revision, six kilograms of marijuana and two rifles were recovered from the possession of the accused and the accused …

• LIAQAT ALI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION KOTWALI 2002 YLR 2014

  Article 202020/8 468/113 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Termination of constitutional application proceedings As a result of civil litigation between the parties up to the level of the H…

• Ch. MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, INVESTIGATING CELL, LAHORE 2002 PCRLJ 2014

  The Pakistan Penal Code Section 337/342/354 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, did not need to be re-investigated in the case of a fresh inquiry into the constitutional petition as the chal…

• RASHAD MEHMOOD v. TARIQ JAVED 2002 YLR 2015

  Article 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 99 Constitutional Appeal The seats of the constituents were challenged by the Moderator and the Deputy Registrar applicants filed an election in which…

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2017

  Definitions of testimony of section 2302 (b) / & 34 & 2 2 2 The prosecution witnesses were not only relevant witnesses but also witnesses of the occasion who needed very strong independent cooperation…

• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2025

  Appreciating the section 2302 evidence, witnesses consistently stated that the accused had shot the victim on his back, that no material contradiction or contradiction could be identified in the ocula…

• MEHBOOB AHMAD v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 2034

  The Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 Sections 5 and 2 (b) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/148/149 transfer of the case of the accused to the juvenile court, the juvenile court …

• THE STATE v. ABDUL KHALIQ 2002 YLR 2034

  Definitions of Articles 302/149, 396/149, 449/149 and 148 testimonies were not supported by the complainant against the accused in the case, along with the eyewitnesses involved in the FIR. There was …

• THE STATE v. HASNAT AHMED 2002 YLR 2041

  Section 2302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (1) Appeal against the forfeiture of the evidence in which the incident occurred was admitted in the possession of the accused where the co…

• MUHAMMAD TAYYAB alias SAJJAD v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2047

  Section 2302 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997 of XXVII), the testimony of the eyes of the eye witnesses were the natural witnesses to the incident that occurred in front of their shop and …

• MUHAMMAD YOUNIS v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2056

  Sections 302/324/337 F (ii) / 427/148/149 Colonial Procedure Code (V 1898), the transfer of the case to Section 439 Juvenile Court, the accused demanded that the case be transferred to the Juvenile Co…

• NAZAR MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 2063

  After the arrest of the accused on sections 514 and 439 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/353/34 bail bail, the trial court proceeded against the bail (applicant) under section 514, C…

• ASGHAR ALI alias SHASHU v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2076

  Sections 452 and 458 of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10 (4) evidence was appreciated in a case in the room of the complainant's house where his wife an…

• WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, WAPDA v. COLLECTOR CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, LAHORE 2002 PTD 2077

  Sales Tax Act 1990 Section 2 (22) (41), 3, 6, 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 34, 35, 39 and 41 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 and Fourth Schedule, Part I, Federal List of Legislatures, Item No. 49 …

• MUKHTAR alias MUKHI v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 2078

  The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (4) and 11 The hearing of the evidence was not relied upon by the complainant's statement and another victim of the pr…

• Mst. ASIYA KAUSAR v. AMJAD IKRAM 2002 YLR 2082

  Section 12 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 554 Implementation of the suit agreement for the specific performance of the contract sales contract, the plaintiff's evidence claimed that th…

• Raja MUHAMMAD HANIF v. THE STATE 2002 PCRLJ 2084

  National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 9 (iv) (v) Definition of Evidence alleges that the beneficiary was not given an opportunity to be heard in the case The wife and brother's brother…

• IJAZ AHMAD v. AKBAR ALI 2002 YLR 2086

  Sections 42, 44 and 53 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 2020 affirming the change in inheritance challenged the respondents 'declaration of inheritance in favor of the applicants in 1945 in…

• GHULAM SHABBIR v. Mst. RAJAN (deceased) through CHIRAGH KHAN 2002 YLR 2090

  O XLI, R 27 and Section 115 Additional Evidence After the appellant's court defeated the defendant at the trial stage to hear a trial related to the application's application, these testimonies were u…

• MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR QAMAR v. DISTRICT JUDGE/ELECTION TRIBUNAL, PAKPATTAN SHARIF 2002 YLR 2094

  Section 14 (e) Article 199 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, R18 (3), Constitution of Pakistan (1973) was disqualified applicant of the candidate after the election, was the candida…

• MUHAMMAD ABBAS SHAH v. JAVAID HAIDER SHAH 2002 YLR 2097

  The specific performance of the contract of sale to the sub-registrar on the date of the target, with the amount to be considered in the Section 12 balance, was contracted by the defendant to sell the…

• MUHAMMAD IRSHAD v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2002 YLR 2101

  Section 14 (2) (a) (b) (as contained in the Punjab Local Government Election (Amendment Ordinance (X of 2001))), Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, R70 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts…

• Raja NAWAB ALI (PVT.) LTD., CHAKWAL v. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2002 YLR 2103

  R98 Constitution Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitutional Appeal After dismissing the appeal appeal, the provincial government passed an order for review of the appeal dismissal Once the appeal was …

• ABDUL QADIR v. MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2002 YLR 2105

  Sections 2 (2) and 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Implementation of the final order reopening the matter in the jurisdiction of the notification officer, the Supreme Court order passed…

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND WEALTH TAX, SIALKOT ZONE, SIALKOT v. Messrs THAPUR (PVT.), SIALKOT 2002 PTD 2112

  Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 80cc Workers \ Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971), Section 4 is incorporated under the provisions of section 80CC, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, Section 4, Workers …

• GHULAM QADIR v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2117

  An FIR was promptly filed through witnesses sections 396/149, 324/149, 449/149 and 148 of the evidence even though he did not testify to the incident during his commission. Confirmed the murder of two…

• IMRAN SAEED v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2129

  The witnesses of the section 497 (2) Contempt of the Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 extra-judicial confession, did not offer a reason why they did not tell the police after the accused had conf…

• MAHMOOD HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2130

  Sections 2302 (b) /, 34, 2 392 / & 34 and 5 365/3434 Definition of Evidence The prosecution's witness was told that the accused had committed an extra-judicial confession until the arrest of the accus…

• YASEEN v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2141

  Section 497 (2) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Guarantee No cause of death was brought on record In the Police Investigation the accused was found innocent when the accused was found in…

• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2144

  Article 22 // 324 // 39 evidence evidence / App evidence Definition of proof Only three unidentified persons were immediately filed without explanation No identification parade was made, even though t…

• SAEED AHMAD v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2148

  Section 7 377 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance of Adultery (1979 1979 1979 VII), Section 10 (3) / 11/12 Definition of evidence, reduction of sentence, no reason for the prosecution's witnesses' disbelief …

• SULTAN KHAN v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2151

  Testimony of Section 302 Evidence In this case three persons of the accused party were also injured, but because of their injuries, we could not prove through prosecution and prosecution that the accu…

• MUHAMMAD IMRAN v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2156

  Section 10 (3) Testimony of Evidence Although both eyewitnesses were the father and uncle of the victim, they had no enmity with the accused in making false allegations in such a case that the reasoni…

• KHUDA BAKHSH v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2160

  Section 302/460/148/149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXV of 1997), Section 7, was not designated in the FIR, and it did not specify any of the accused, including ten months. An individual has reportedly…

• KARAMAT ALI v. THE STATE 2002 YLR 2166

  Article 302/308/34 The co-accused accused the co-accused, the father of the accused, was an old man and was not convicted in any way and the trial court was convicted against the co-accused and prosec…

Other years — Lahore High Court Lahore

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.