Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASGHAR versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/34 definition of evidence was a daylight case and a special FIR was lodged against the accused for causing fatal injury to the victim and the defendant's guilt. Also confirmed the allegation. Although one of the prosecution's witnesses was the victim's son, the other two witnesses were not shown to be closely related to the defendant's defense. It did not prove that the witnesses presented by the prosecution had any hostility or serious illness against the accused. Was falsely accused of. In such a case, full evidence was supported by the fatal fireworks injury allegedly caused by the victim's head, the statements of witnesses were quite consistent and they were greatly supported by medical evidence. The accused involved in the murder was presented by the prosecution. The convictions of the accused were impressive and impressive. The same charges can be laid down and the conviction by the trial court against the accused was upheld and maintained and the charges against the accused were bad. Matched the suspect. Saeed did not believe the allegations against the accompanying accused were dismissed by the trial court and were acquitted by the co-accused. The trial court should extend the benefit of the doubt to the co-accused as well, and it is also unsafe to prevent his / her co-accused from the benefit of the doubt which has already been passed by the trial court to his co-accused. Which was carefully avoided because of this. The co-accused, a safe administration of criminal justice, was also acquitted of the charges online advocate from Islamabad lawyer