SULTAN KHAN versus THE STATE
Testimony of Section 302 Evidence In this case three persons of the accused party were also injured, but because of their injuries, we could not prove through prosecution and prosecution that the accused were in friendly hands with the accused, the victim. There was only one injury to the person. The accused was acquitted by the trial court on the same evidence, since the arrest of the accused, he was behind bars and was never granted bail, while the case against the accused as a complaining party. Was self-defense, which did not allow the accused. The two parties jointly used the tube well to convict the accused in section 302 (b) for irrigating the cultivated fields on their turn. C), the PPC and the conviction in which the accused was convicted. Already treated, it was considered sufficient to accomplish the pursuit of justice
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Ali Chak lawyer