MUHAMMAD ASLAM SHAH versus PAK ELECTRON (PVT.) LTD
Civil Procedure Code Order XVII and XVII, R3 and O XXXVII, Rr 2, 3 and Section 115 of the CPC Adjustments Proof of closure of the evidence The defendants with regard to the jurisdiction of the restoration, on the deadline specified for the preparation of evidence Presenting another witness who requested to be postponed, whose details cannot be disclosed by the defendant's court through the defendant's request and his evidence was closed, neither the non-conclusive evidence in the concluding evidence of the accused's evidence. Legal action has not been taken and neither is requested to interfere with the CPC's discretion, under any 115 jurisdiction under Section 115 Can go Matters that were under the discretion of the subordinate courts, the concluding evidence of the evidence passed by the court to the defendant / applicant showed that it was not a matter of illegal exercise, non-exercise or illicit assumption of jurisdiction. That is, no interference in the case was guaranteed, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
