RASHEED AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 364/302/201/297 Conan Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 43 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 555 The termination of an action was not designated in the FIR and they were involved in the case. The statement of the co-accused when he was in custody was not charged that the accused was accused of being involved in the commission of the murder of the victim but did not have evidence to participate in the murder commission. Was neither given nor helped. In the absence of any evidence in this regard, the agreement by the participating accused, although relevant to the testimony of the law at Article 1984 of Article 1984, cannot guarantee the conviction of the accused alone. Unless any other reliable evidence of it is confirmed. The Sessions Court dismissed the plea of the accused under Section 265, CRPC, and proceedings against them as a result of the FIR were also terminated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer
