Find a Lawyer

HABIB-UR-REHMAN versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 381A / 411 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), defining Section 7 evidence, was against the accused alleging that he had stolen a car outside the mosque in his cross-examination which stated that He did not join the watchman of the mosque. The investigator, who saw the suspect in the car and did not ask the watchman to identify the suspect, also did not join the owner of the tire repair shop where the car was repaired at the relevant time. Was standing Or was taken away, no offense was found under Section 7A of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the prosecution's case was dismissed with suspicion while seeking punishment under Section 7B of the Act and the prosecution The story was unbelievable, considering all the evidence in the trial was not properly examined. The trial against the accused, which is not proved by the trial, was passed by the trial court verdict against the accused, it was set aside and the accused was released from jail. jobs for fresh advocates from Silanwala lawyer