GHULAM SHABBIR versus MST. RAJAN (DECEASED) THROUGH CHIRAGH KHAN
O XLI, R 27 and Section 115 Additional Evidence After the appellant's court defeated the defendant at the trial stage to hear a trial related to the application's application, these testimonies were used for the purpose of investigation. Also failed to move the appeal with the request. Plaintiffs moved a request for additional evidence to prevent Defendants' detention and rectify the weaknesses of their case. The appellate court allowed the application and remanded the trial court to record additional evidence; the need to examine the court testimony; after hearing the final arguments, the appellate court itself did not feel it. No directive was issued by itself The filing of the present application for additional evidence cannot be made in accordance with the requirements of the court itself. The appellant's discretion and jurisdiction were not exercised properly while allowing the plaintiff's decision and the order of the appellate court to set aside additional evidence and remand the case, and to appeal the decision of the case Was remanded to appellate court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Swat lawyer