Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

In view of the value of the section 302 (b) evidence, the witnesses fully affirmed each other on all material points, and their evidence was influenced by the belief that they were Eve's uncle and father's uncle. Had no reason to retaliate against the real culprit. Not acquainted with the outcome of acquittal of the two accomplices, who were acquitted by the trial court on the basis of doubt over the principle of justice management, medical evidence supported the ocular testimony as given in the FIR The crime was proven to be a crime. The opportunity sent to the forensic science laboratory yielded empty security, which led to the suspect confessing that he had turned the gun over to the Investigation Officer himself, with the prosecution's non-recovery of public witnesses to no avail. Was. There is no mitigating circumstance in favor of the conviction and the death sentence of the accused best law firms from Bannu lawyer