KHAN MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Appreciating the section 2302 evidence, witnesses consistently stated that the accused had shot the victim on his back, that no material contradiction or contradiction could be identified in the ocular testimony. Evidence from the scene of the injury and the location of the incident was obtained from the medical evidence, the vacant safe from the location confirmed that the suspect was fired from a gun recovered from the Defense version. And the accused was released. Due to the previous enmity, it was not established, but an FIR was filed immediately after the incident which led to the authenticity of the impending retaliation and the loss of family honor which was in favor of the accused and the accused. There was a mitigation situation. His sentence was not called for punishment and the accused was convicted under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Ghizer lawyer
