CH. ARFAN JABBAZ ALIAS CH. ZAFAR IQBAL versus MST. RIZWANA JABEEN
Section 1 (2) of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance and 9 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Article 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition, jurisdiction over grant of period In absence of the court, such a plea was not raised before that the petitioner was a British citizen who had divorced the defendant for the restoration of the previous restoration and the duration of the trial. The Muslim Family Law was introduced under section 9 of the Ordinance, 1961, which was approved by both courts. The complaint, along with the last restoration period of 90 days, was that the lower courts had improperly taken jurisdiction in this case as the applicant was not a Muslim citizen of Pakistan and the duration of the period was 39 days. Was fixed for 90 days from the contents of the review petition filed below did not extend the jurisdiction, therefore, he was not allowed to argue. He, likewise, had before the High Court the constitutional jurisdiction of both tribunals. Was not in accordance with the Supreme Court's prescribed order under which Allah Dad V Mukhtar wrote in the 1992 S. M or R 1273 was amended. The decisions below were approved by both tribunals to the extent that instead of retaining the 90-day extension period, it was reduced to 39 days.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
