FARRAKH SHAHZAD versus THE STATE
Testimony of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/34 Evidence was fully proved by the eyewitnesses to the incident that it was the accused who shot and killed the deceased and proved the purpose of the incident. Full charge of evidence against the evidence was confirmed The accused under section 2302, the PPC has been fully established, he was properly convicted and sentenced under section 24ge24, PPC reasonable doubt Was not proven and was acquitted of the charge, but was convicted under Section C302, PPC, by the trial court. Was given the death sentence. Koczos was solely responsible for raising Lalcarra, and even according to the prosecutor's story, the co-accused was left blank at the time of the incident, so that no charges against the accused were recorded. If he had harmed any of the accused or the prosecution's witnesses, if the participant had a common intention with the accused, he could have tried to hurt the defendant or any of the prosecution witnesses but there was no charge against the partner. The accused was also not charged with arresting any of the prosecution's witnesses or the victim. The record was not available to associate the co-accused with the crime, all charges were dismissed for the benefit of the suspect.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer