THE STATE versus ABDUL KHALIQ
Definitions of Articles 302/149, 396/149, 449/149 and 148 testimonies were not supported by the complainant against the accused in the case, along with the eyewitnesses involved in the FIR. There was no specific recovery effect. The accused was not held in accordance with the law and could not be convicted. Besides, the medical evidence itself was not sufficient to link the accused to the incident, the prosecution's evidence was mutually destructive and of no credibility. The accused was not acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Charsada lawyer
