MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus THE STATE
The testimony of Section 302 (b) was corroborated by the medical evidence cogent molecular evidence, and the recovery evidence admitted that it caused the victim to have fireworks injuries, but a different version and version of the incident. In which he had failed. Defense evidence contradicts itself in material details and cannot be safely relied upon by the prosecutor's evidence when placed in the position of justice with the evidence of the defense revealed that the prosecutor has effectively proved his case while the defense defended itself. Failed to produce any evidence, on the record in favor of the accused in the award of a lesser sentence and the conviction of those convicted was retained in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer